2014
DOI: 10.4171/em/262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some remarks about Descartes’ rule of signs

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crucial role of sign vectors in the characterization of existence and uniqueness of positive solutions to parametrized polynomial equations suggests a comparison with Descartes' rule of signs for univariate (generalized) polynomials [47,35,29]. A sharp rule [1] states that a univariate polynomial with given sign sequence has exactly one positive solution for all (positive) coefficients if and only if there is exactly one sign change. Indeed, this statement follows from our main result which can be seen as a multivariate generalization of the sharp Descartes' rule for exactly one positive solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crucial role of sign vectors in the characterization of existence and uniqueness of positive solutions to parametrized polynomial equations suggests a comparison with Descartes' rule of signs for univariate (generalized) polynomials [47,35,29]. A sharp rule [1] states that a univariate polynomial with given sign sequence has exactly one positive solution for all (positive) coefficients if and only if there is exactly one sign change. Indeed, this statement follows from our main result which can be seen as a multivariate generalization of the sharp Descartes' rule for exactly one positive solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) For real, but not necessarily hyperbolic degree d polynomials, one can ask the question: It seems that the question has been explicitly formulated for the first time in [2]. The answer to it is not trivial and the exhaustive one is known for d ≤ 8, see [7], [1], [5], [8] and [9]. The proof of the realizability of certain cases is often done by means of a concatenation lemma, see Lemma 2 in Section 7.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that if Theorem 1 is true, then one should not be able to deduce with the help of Lemma 2 the realizability of the sign pattern σ 0 with the admissible pair (1,8). Now we show that this is indeed impossible.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1828 Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855) has shown that if the roots are counted with multiplicity, then the number of positive roots has the same parity as c. When applied to P (−x), these results give an upper bound on the number of negative roots of P . It is proved in [1] that all possible cases (i.e. of c, c − 2, c − 4, .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation