2002
DOI: 10.4064/cm92-2-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some remarks on duality of stationary sequences

Abstract: Abstract. The paper clarifies the connection between Urbanik's and Miamee and Pourahmadi's concepts of duality for univariate weakly stationary random sequences. Some of Urbanik's results are proved in an alternative way and at the same time generalized to the multivariate case.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the question above, it is worth noting that Nakazi's technique, if viewed properly, reduces the computation of σ 2 (f , S n ) to that of the (n + 1)-step prediction error variance of another stationary process {Y t } with the spectral density function f −1 , which we call the dual of {X t } (see Definition 1 and Section 4.3). His result and technique have spawned considerable research in this area in the last two decades; see Miamee and Pourahmadi (1988), Miamee (1993), Cheng et al (1998), Frank and Klotz (2002), Klotz and Riedel (2002) and Bondon (2002). A unifying feature of most of the known results thus far seems to be a fundamental duality principle of the form…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning the question above, it is worth noting that Nakazi's technique, if viewed properly, reduces the computation of σ 2 (f , S n ) to that of the (n + 1)-step prediction error variance of another stationary process {Y t } with the spectral density function f −1 , which we call the dual of {X t } (see Definition 1 and Section 4.3). His result and technique have spawned considerable research in this area in the last two decades; see Miamee and Pourahmadi (1988), Miamee (1993), Cheng et al (1998), Frank and Klotz (2002), Klotz and Riedel (2002) and Bondon (2002). A unifying feature of most of the known results thus far seems to be a fundamental duality principle of the form…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As a consequence, we find a new and explicit formula for the dual of the random process {X t ; t ≤ n} for a fixed n, which does not seem to be possible using the technique of Urbanik (2000), Klotz and Riedel (2002) and Frank and Klotz (2002). This is particularly useful in developing series representations for predictors and interpolators, and sheds light on the approaches of Bondon (2002) and Salehi (1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Neither problem is particularly simple but the latter seems simpler. In [2,Theorems 5,6], an orthogonalization method is used to compute σ 2 (w, S 3 ). Then the duality relation (2.4) is used to give σ 2 (w, S 2 ), yielding…”
Section: Duality and Orthogonalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, n}, n ≥ 1, has generated considerable interest in computing σ p (w, S) when the index set S is S 0 with finitely many points of Z added or deleted. To name some related contributions, let us mention here Cheng et al [2], Frank and Klotz [4], Klotz and Riedel [6], Kolmogorov [7], Miamee and Pourahmadi [9], Pourahmadi [13], [14], and Urbanik [15]. At present, the best known general result is Theorem 2 of Cheng et al [2], which states that, for such an S, σ p (w, S) is positive if and only if log w ∈ L 1 (dµ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, it is worth noting that Nakazi's technique, if interpreted properly, amounts to reducing computation of σ 2 (f, S n ) to that of the (n + 1)-step prediction error variance of another stationary process {Y t } with the spectral density function f −1 which turns out to be the dual of {X t } (see Definition 2.1 and Section 3.5). His result and technique have spawned considerable research in this area in the last two decades; see Miamee and Pourahmadi (1988), Miamee (1993), Cheng et al (1998), Frank and Klotz (2002), Klotz and Riedel (2002) and Bondon (2002). A unifying feature of most of the known results thus far seems to be a fundamental duality principle (Cheng et al (1998), Urbanik (2000)) of the form…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%