2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2005.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some remarks on Strichartz estimates for homogeneous wave equation

Abstract: We give several remarks on Strichartz estimates for homogeneous wave equation with special attention to the cases of L ∞ x estimates, radial solutions and initial data from the inhomogeneous Sobolev spaces. In particular, we give the failure of the endpoint estimate L 4 t L ∞ x for n = 2.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Set δ and δ as in (2). Then there is a positive constant C 2 , such that the following estimates hold …”
Section: Proposition 42mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Set δ and δ as in (2). Then there is a positive constant C 2 , such that the following estimates hold …”
Section: Proposition 42mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we want to present a proof based on the recent generalized Strichartz estimates of Smith, Sogge and Wang [19] (with the previous radial estimates in Fang and Wang [2]). Lemma 6.1 (Generalized Strichartz estimates).…”
Section: Glassey Conjecture When N = 2 P > P Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We mention that the related estimates for (1.7) where L 2 θ is replaced by L r θ (with norms of different regularity in the right) were proved by Sterbenz [14] for n ≥ 4 and the authors [4] for the general case n ≥ 2. In the radial case, the estimates (1.7) and the higher dimensional version were proved by the authors in [2] (with previous works in Sogge [10] for n = 3, Sterbenz [14] for n ≥ 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…When 4 < q < ∞, the Strichartz estimates (1.7) is weaker than the standard Strichartz estimates (see Theorem 3 of [2])…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation