2009
DOI: 10.37236/183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Results on Chromatic Polynomials of Hypergraphs

Abstract: In this paper, chromatic polynomials of (non-uniform) hypercycles, unicyclic hypergraphs, hypercacti and sunflower hypergraphs are presented. The formulae generalize known results for $r$-uniform hypergraphs due to Allagan, Borowiecki/Łazuka, Dohmen and Tomescu. Furthermore, it is shown that the class of (non-uniform) hypertrees with $m$ edges, where $m_r$ edges have size $r$, $r\geq 2$, is chromatically closed if and only if $m\leq4$, $m_2\geq m-1$.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the function counting the number of strong proper λ-colourings in H is not different from the chromatic polynomial of a graph. It is probably for this reason that most articles on chromatic polynomials of hypergraphs in the past two decades focused on the function counting the number of weak proper λ-colourings in a hypergraph H (see [1,2,3,8,13,36,37,38,39,41,42]).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus the function counting the number of strong proper λ-colourings in H is not different from the chromatic polynomial of a graph. It is probably for this reason that most articles on chromatic polynomials of hypergraphs in the past two decades focused on the function counting the number of weak proper λ-colourings in a hypergraph H (see [1,2,3,8,13,36,37,38,39,41,42]).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may have been noticed to be a polynomial by Chvátal [11]. It has been studied extensively in the past twenty years by many researchers, such as Allagan [1,2,3], Borowiecki and Lazuka [8], Dohmen [13], Tomescu [36,37,38,39], Voloshin [41] and Walter [42]. They extended many properties of chromatic polynomials of graphs on computations, expressions, factorizations, etc, to chromatic polynomials of hypergraphs.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of determining the family H = {H : P (H, λ) = P (H , λ)} for a given hypergraph H is very difficult. Some families H have been confirmed in [5,6,19,20,21,23,24]. A hypergraph H = (V, E) is said to be h-uniform if |e| = h holds for all e ∈ E. It is unknown if all hypergraphs in H are h-uniform for any given h-uniform hypergraph H.…”
Section: Problem 1 Characterize Chromatic Polynomials Of Hypergraphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graph-function P (H, λ) for a hypergraph H appeared in the work of Helgason [15] in 1972, but it is unknown if it had been mentioned earlier. It has been studied extensively in the past twenty years by many researches, such as Allagan [1,2,3], Borowiecki and Łazuka [5,6], Dohmen [8,9], Drgas-Burchardt and Łazuka [13], Tomescu [19,20,21,22,23] and Walter [24]. A number of properties of chromatic polynomials of graphs related to their expressions, computations and factorizations, etc, have been extended to chromatic polynomials of hypergraphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Q(λ) is a polynomial of degree at most equal to n − 3h + r + 2, α 1 = m − 1 is the number of subpaths P h,r 2 of length two, α 2 = m 2 − m + 1 is the number of pairs of pairwise disjoint edges and α 3 = m − 2 is the number of subpaths P h,r 3 of length three in P h,r m . Also since any spanning subhypergraph of P h,r m induced by less than m edges is not connected, it follows that in (5) the coefficient of λ is (−1) m , which implies that H is also connected [15]. Since H has all edges of cardinality h, it follows that the number of components of a spanning subhypergraph of H may be n, n − h + 1 or a smaller number.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%