The most intriguing aspect of the new theory of matchgate computations and holographic algorithms by Valiant [12] [14] is that its reach and ultimate capability are wide open. The methodology produces unexpected polynomial time algorithms solving problems which seem to require exponential time. To sustain our belief in P = NP, we must begin to develop a theory which captures the limit of expressibility and power of this new methodology.In holographic algorithms, symmetric signatures have been particularly useful. We give a complete characterization of these symmetric signatures over all bases of size 1. These improve previous results [4] where only symmetric signatures over the Hadamard basis (special basis of size 1) were obtained. This in particular confirms a conjecture by Valiant [18]. We also give a complete characterization of Boolean symmetric signatures over bases of size 1.Finally, it is an open problem whether signatures over bases of higher dimensions are strictly more powerful. The recent result by Valiant [17] seems to suggest that bases of size 2 might be indeed more powerful than bases of size 1. This result is with regard to a restrictive counting version of #SAT called #Pl-Rtw-Mon-3CNF. It is known that the problem is #P-hard, and its mod 2 version is ⊕P-hard. Yet its mod 7 version is solvable in polynomial time by holographic algorithms. This was accomplished by a suitable symmetric signature over a basis of size 2 [17]. We show that the same unexpected holographic algorithm can be realized over a basis of size 1. Furthermore we prove that 7 is the only modulus for which such an "accidental algorithm" exists.Subject: Computational and structural complexity.