1978
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.1978.1129457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Results on the End Effects of Microstriplines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 which also shows schematically the sampling functions. For comparison purposes, we also include in this work a one-dimensional (1-D) analysis, where no singularities are considered and the test functions are reduced to the following triangular sampling functions: (6) In (6) is the unknown amplitude of the current at the center of the cell When a two-dimensional (2-D) analysis is performed, the test function includes the straight edge singularity and can be formulated as follows: (7) In the three-dimensional (3-D) treatment, (7) holds for the body cells, whereas for the corner cells the test functions must fit the vertex conditions as follows: (8) is the radial distance from the tip A in Fig. 3 and (see in [3, (5), as shown in the next section.…”
Section: The Choice Of the Test Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 which also shows schematically the sampling functions. For comparison purposes, we also include in this work a one-dimensional (1-D) analysis, where no singularities are considered and the test functions are reduced to the following triangular sampling functions: (6) In (6) is the unknown amplitude of the current at the center of the cell When a two-dimensional (2-D) analysis is performed, the test function includes the straight edge singularity and can be formulated as follows: (7) In the three-dimensional (3-D) treatment, (7) holds for the body cells, whereas for the corner cells the test functions must fit the vertex conditions as follows: (8) is the radial distance from the tip A in Fig. 3 and (see in [3, (5), as shown in the next section.…”
Section: The Choice Of the Test Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to validate these hypotheses, I have made some significant changes in the dimensions of the box and then the variations in at 4, 18, and 22 GHz were determined. Unfortunately, the actual measurement techniques for this accurate frequency dependence suffer from repeatability measurement errors (see [6], [8]). …”
Section: Effective-length Frequency Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work deals with the determination of the capacitance parameters of the equivalent circuit of the AECMOED by means of a static method of analysis. Although in practice these capacitance parameters are frequency dependent, their static limit value is expected to be approximately constant in a wide frequency interval for the range of dimensions usually employed in microwave integrated circuits [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%