2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10587-014-0104-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some results on the local cohomology of minimax modules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following lemma is needed in the proof of the next theorem. We are now ready to state and prove the main results (Theorem 2.7 and the Corollaries 2.8 and 2.10) which are extensions of Bahmanpour-Naghipour's results in [7] and [8] in terms of minimax modules, [1], Corollary 2.3, [2], Theorem 3.4 and Corollaries 3.5 and 3.6, [24], Corollary 2.3, and Hong Quy's result in [32].…”
Section: Cominimaxness Of Local Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following lemma is needed in the proof of the next theorem. We are now ready to state and prove the main results (Theorem 2.7 and the Corollaries 2.8 and 2.10) which are extensions of Bahmanpour-Naghipour's results in [7] and [8] in terms of minimax modules, [1], Corollary 2.3, [2], Theorem 3.4 and Corollaries 3.5 and 3.6, [24], Corollary 2.3, and Hong Quy's result in [32].…”
Section: Cominimaxness Of Local Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Recently many authors have studied the minimaxness and cominimaxness of local cohomology modules and answered Conjecture 1.1 and Question 1.2 in the class of minimax modules in some cases (see [1], [7], [20], [22] [24], [26]). The purpose of this note is to make a suitable generalization of Conjecture 1.1 and Question 1.2 in terms of minimax modules instead of finitely generated modules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F D 1 (R, I) ethcom ) is an Abelian category.Proof. We prove theorem for the W L (R, I) ethcom case and by using the same proof, the F D1 (R, I) ethcom case follows. Let M, N ∈ W L (R, I) ethcom and let f : M −→ N be an R-homomorphism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…≤1 R-module and the assertion follows by Corollary 2.11 (i). (ii) Proof is the same as 2.11 (ii).One of the main results of this section is to prove that for an arbitrary ideal I of a Noetherian ring R, the category of W L (R, I) ethcom and F D1 (R, I) ethcom modules are Abelian category. Let I be an ideal of a Noetherian ring R. Let W L (R, I) ethcom (resp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation