1994
DOI: 10.1080/10556789408805578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Saddle-function splitting methods for convex programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown by Eckstein and Bertsekas [15] that the ADM, as a special case of Douglas-Rachford splitting [20], is actually an application of the proximal point algorithm on the dual problem by means of a specially-constructed splitting operator. Based on the same argument by further applying a change of variable to the operators, Eckstein [14] presented the first proximal ADM as in (8.2) with S = µ 1 I and T = µ 2 I for positive constants µ 1 > 0 and µ 2 > 0. Later, He et al [25] further extended the idea of Eckstein [14] to monotone variational inequalities to allow λ, S, and T to be replaced by different parameters λ k , S k , and T k in each iteration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was shown by Eckstein and Bertsekas [15] that the ADM, as a special case of Douglas-Rachford splitting [20], is actually an application of the proximal point algorithm on the dual problem by means of a specially-constructed splitting operator. Based on the same argument by further applying a change of variable to the operators, Eckstein [14] presented the first proximal ADM as in (8.2) with S = µ 1 I and T = µ 2 I for positive constants µ 1 > 0 and µ 2 > 0. Later, He et al [25] further extended the idea of Eckstein [14] to monotone variational inequalities to allow λ, S, and T to be replaced by different parameters λ k , S k , and T k in each iteration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the same argument by further applying a change of variable to the operators, Eckstein [14] presented the first proximal ADM as in (8.2) with S = µ 1 I and T = µ 2 I for positive constants µ 1 > 0 and µ 2 > 0. Later, He et al [25] further extended the idea of Eckstein [14] to monotone variational inequalities to allow λ, S, and T to be replaced by different parameters λ k , S k , and T k in each iteration. The convergence results provided in [14] and [25] for the proximal ADM both need S and T to be positive definite, which limits the applications of the method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding extension of the (FB-M) algorithm was proposed by Chen and Teboulle [17] and a similar idea was used by Eckstein [31] to extend (ADMM) (see too [84,3]). A recent survey by Shefi and Teboulle [75] recalled the complexity issues to improve global convergence ratios, in particular for regularized versions of the splitting schemes.…”
Section: Algorithmic Enhancementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many decomposition techniques (for monotone problems) are explicitly derived from the proximal point method [29,32] for maximal monotone operators, e.g., [10,41,42,44]. Sometimes the relation to the proximal iterates is less direct, e.g., the methods in [4,11,17,31,43], which were nevertheless more recently generalized and interpreted in [37,27] within the hybrid inexact proximal schemes of [39,30]. As some other decomposition methods, we might mention [22] which employs projection and cutting-plane techniques for certain structured problems, matrix splitting for complementarity problems in [6], and the applications of the latter to stochastic complementarity problems in [35].…”
Section: (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%