1932
DOI: 10.1021/cr60037a002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Significant Results in Crystal Structure Analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1936
1936
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The van der Waals radius , R vdW , of an element A could similarly be derived by halving the A···A distance in a nonbonding interaction, eq 11, see ref or, in principle, by using eq 12. As well-known to the originators of the concept, , the use of eq 11 is problematic because the A···A distances in different compounds vary a great deal. It is simply not obvious, especially for the heavier elements, which case represents a “normal” van der Waals distance.…”
Section: The Simplest Models:  Radiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The van der Waals radius , R vdW , of an element A could similarly be derived by halving the A···A distance in a nonbonding interaction, eq 11, see ref or, in principle, by using eq 12. As well-known to the originators of the concept, , the use of eq 11 is problematic because the A···A distances in different compounds vary a great deal. It is simply not obvious, especially for the heavier elements, which case represents a “normal” van der Waals distance.…”
Section: The Simplest Models:  Radiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atom charges in Lewis diagrams were first introduced in a general way as “residual charge” by Langmuir . The first use of the term “formal charge” that I can find is in a paper by Huggins …”
Section: Atom Charges In Lewis Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HUGGINS bility of the atom concerned) . The usual structural formula for a salt, according to which the number of bonds joining each metal or halogen ion (for instance) to other atoms equals its valence, does not repre sent the structure accurately (2,3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%