2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some simple nonparametric methods to test for perfect ranking in ranked set sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the RSS setting, some tests for this purpose have been developed by Frey et al (2007), Li and Balakrishnan (2008), Zamanzade et al (2012), Frey and Wang (2013) and Zamanzade et al (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the RSS setting, some tests for this purpose have been developed by Frey et al (2007), Li and Balakrishnan (2008), Zamanzade et al (2012), Frey and Wang (2013) and Zamanzade et al (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independently from Frey et al (2007), Li and Balakrishnan (2008) developed some nonparametric tests of perfect ranking for balanced RSS. Let…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, it is only recently that we see that some tests for perfect ranking have been introduced. Frey et al (2007) and Li and Balakrishnan (2008) independently proposed some nonparametric (distribution-free) tests for perfect ranking. Vock and Balakrishnan (2011) improved one of the Li and Balakrishnan (2008) tests and made some comparisons among these tests, using Monte Carlo simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vock and Balakrishnan (2011) improved one of the Li and Balakrishnan (2008) tests and made some comparisons among these tests, using Monte Carlo simulations. Furthermore, Vock and Balakrishnan (2012) generalized another test proposed by Li and Balakrishnan (2008) and showed that their generalized test is equivalent to the test proposed by Frey et al (2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%