The main purpose of the present paper is to compare two different kinds of approaches in modeling the deck of a suspension bridge, the first one consisting in looking at the deck as a rectangular plate and the second one as a beam concerning vertical deflections and as a rod concerning torsional deformations. Throughout this paper we will refer to the model corresponding to the second approach as the beam-rod model. In our discussion, we observe that the beam-rod model has more degrees of freedom if compared with the isotropic plate model. For this reason the beam-rod model is supposed to be more appropiate to describe the behavior of the deck of a realistic suspension bridge. A possible strategy to make the plate model more efficient could be to relax the isotropy condition with a more general condition of orthotropy, which is expected to increase the degrees of freedom in view of the larger number of elastic constants. In this new setting, it becomes more meaningful comparing the two approaches.Basic results are proved for the suggested problem, from existence and uniqueness of solutions to spectral properties. We suggest realistic values for the elastic parameters thus obtaining with both approaches similar responses in the static and dynamic behavior of the deck. This can be considered as a preliminary article since many work has still to be done with the perspective of formulating models for a complete suspension bridge which take into account not only the deck but also the action on it of cables and hangers. With this perspective, a section is devoted to open questions dealing with possible future developments.