2004
DOI: 10.1075/sl.28.2.03fan
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some strategies for coding sentential subjects in English

Abstract: This study examines two types of -ing subjects in English: the Late Modern English pattern the deceiving him was easy and constructions such as by trying to make her mother happy proved unlucky for Paul, which are becoming frequent among American undergraduates. It is argued that the presence of the and by in both structures is prompted by the desire to provide explicit grammatical marking for clauses that, because of their role as pre-verbal subjects, are cognitively very complex. The paper discusses the ongo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, the conclusion that the definite article, as used with the gerund in the early 16 th century, is not a functionally empty element can account for the historical fact that, as the verbalisation of the gerund proceeded, the use of definite gerund constructions was nevertheless maintained, both in the form of definite nominal gerunds, which still occur in Present-Day English, and in the form of so-called hybrid gerunds, as are illustrated in (36). On the other, it has been suggested by Fanego (2004b) that at a certain stage in the history of the gerund the definite article has lost its semantic value. Similarly, it seems to make no sense to treat (all) bare verbal gerunds as they are used in Late Modern and Present-Day English as indefinite (see e.g.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Perspectives -45-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the conclusion that the definite article, as used with the gerund in the early 16 th century, is not a functionally empty element can account for the historical fact that, as the verbalisation of the gerund proceeded, the use of definite gerund constructions was nevertheless maintained, both in the form of definite nominal gerunds, which still occur in Present-Day English, and in the form of so-called hybrid gerunds, as are illustrated in (36). On the other, it has been suggested by Fanego (2004b) that at a certain stage in the history of the gerund the definite article has lost its semantic value. Similarly, it seems to make no sense to treat (all) bare verbal gerunds as they are used in Late Modern and Present-Day English as indefinite (see e.g.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Perspectives -45-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diachronic evolution of the English complementation system has been widely studied (see Warner 1982;Fischer 1988Fischer , 1989Fanego 1990Fanego , 1992Fanego , 1996aFanego , 1996bFanego , 1998Fanego , 2004aFanego , 2004bFanego , 2007Fanego , 2010Fanego , 2016Rohdenburg 1995Rohdenburg , 2006Rohdenburg , 2014Rudanko 1998Rudanko , 2000Rudanko , 2011Miller 2002;Los 2005;Vosberg 2006;De Smet, 2008, 2013. However, complementation has not received much attention in the area of World Englishes, despite it being considered an area prone not only to variation and change but also to innovation (Mukherjee and Hoffmann 2006: 148;Schneider 2007: 86).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the most notable of these changes are the spread of the infinitive at the expense of finite clauses (see Rohdenburg, 1995) and the establishment of the gerund as a second type of non-finite complement alongside infinitives after it developed verbal features during Late Middle English (Fanego, 1996a(Fanego, , 2004b.…”
Section: The English Clausal Complementation System and The Verb Regretmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rohdenburg, 2006: 143) or, in Sapir's terms (1921), as a drift (cf. Fanego, 2007: 162, see also, among others, Warner, 1982;Fischer, 1988Fischer, , 1989Fanego, 1990Fanego, , 1992Fanego, , 1996aFanego, , 1996bFanego, , 1998Fanego, , 2004aFanego, , 2004bFanego, , 2010Fanego, , 2016Rohdenburg, 1995Rohdenburg, , 2006Rohdenburg, , 2014Rudanko, 1998Rudanko, , 2000Rudanko, , 2011Miller, 2002;Los, 2005;Vosberg, 2006;and De Smet, 2008, 2010. However, further work on variation in clausal complementation is still needed, especially in Present-Day English "where comparatively little work has been done" (Fanego, 2007: 161), and also in World Englishes, since, as Schneider (2007: 86) argues, "a classic example [of innovations in varieties in phase 4, nativization] is the complementation patterns which verbs and also adjectives typically enter".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%