2009
DOI: 10.1080/02635140802658842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some student teachers’ conceptions of creativity in school science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
61
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey response rate was 93% (116 out of 125 questionnaires). I developed the first questionnaire by conferring to the questionnaires of Newton and Newton (2009) and Kitchen et al (2009). The final version of the questionnaire consisted of 29 items divided into four major sections including 2 items for asking to providing order of preference and 2 items for asking free wring style questions.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey response rate was 93% (116 out of 125 questionnaires). I developed the first questionnaire by conferring to the questionnaires of Newton and Newton (2009) and Kitchen et al (2009). The final version of the questionnaire consisted of 29 items divided into four major sections including 2 items for asking to providing order of preference and 2 items for asking free wring style questions.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A demand for fostering creativity has become a universal discourse across different nations, reflecting globalization of economic activity (Craft, 2003;Newton & Newton, 2009). The function of education serves as a building block of human capital through equipping students with knowledge and creative capacities (Lin, 2011;NACCCE, 1999;Shaheen, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Russ et al (2009) found that, at the high-school level, students and teachers invariably evaluate the validity of ideas and explanations through consultation of textbooks, or other expert repositories, in the first instance. While consultation of published text has heuristic merit, excessive dependence on external verification of ideas can be counterproductive, leading to conceptualisation of scientific ability as focussed on recall of facts and technical/practical skill (Newton & Newton, 2009) rather than the ability to extend and reconfigure understanding when confronted with novel problems.…”
Section: The Reality Of Scientific Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcripts of conversations between, and interviews with, teachers and students who have developed and applied peer-scaffolding approaches however, suggest that rather than encouraging individuals to develop their own understanding, the net effect often reduces to a validation-by-consensus mentality (Capraro, Kulm, & Capraro, 2005;Chin & Chia, 2004;Demirci, 2008;Gautier, Deutsch, & Rebich, 2006;Hamza & Wickman, 2008;Mills et al, 2008;Nehm & Reilly, 2007;Newton & Newton, 2009;Psycharis & Babaroutsis, 2005;Salierno, Edelson, & Sherin, 2005;Settlage, 2007;Smith & Abell, 2008;Stamp, 2007;Stamp & Armstrong, 2005;Wali Abdi, 2006). This does not mean that deployment of peer-scaffolded learning cannot deliver substantial learning gains for individuals.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Sociocultural Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation