“…While these approaches have been shown to accurately describe hydrodynamic loading in a multitude of experimental studies, their validation is largely limited to specific geometries, whereby the majority of experimental studies have focused on flat wedges (Bisplinghoff and Doherty, 1952;Greenhow, 1987;Engle, 2003;Wu et al, 2004;Carcaterra and Ciappi, 2004;Tveitnes et al, 2008;Lewis et al, 2010;Stenius et al, 2013), cylinders (Greenhow and Yanbao, 1987;Cointe and Armand, 1987;Garrison, 1996;Battistin and Iafrati, 2003;Sun and Faltinsen, 2006), spheres (De Backer et al, 2009;El Malki Alaoui et al, 2012;Truscott et al, 2012), and cones (De Backer et al, 2009;El Malki Alaoui et al, 2012). More complex geometries, such as paraboloids and pyramids, have only been investigated in theoretical studies (Scolan and Korobkin, 2001;Korobkin, 2002;Gazzola et al, 2005;Korobkin and Scolan, 2006;Moore et al, 2012), and the effect of geometric curvature on the water entry of rigid bodies is yet to be fully experimentally quantified, see also the review by Abrate (2013).…”