Some Thoughts on Development Evaluation Processes

Abstract

A lively methodological debate together with organisational adjustments has dominated the international discussion on development evaluation in the last decade. Less discussed have been the evaluation processes, from procurement of consultants to the completion of evaluations, where many donors have used the same ‘system’ with only minor adjustments for many years. A key question is whether this ‘system’ is still ‘fit for purpose’ in view of the increasing complexity of many development interventions. This article presents three perspectives on development evaluation processes – the ‘independence perspective’, the ‘transaction cost perspective’ and the ‘political economy perspective’ – and argues that in particular the ‘political economy perspective’ constitutes a relevant perspective in analyses of evaluation processes. It is concluded that evaluation processes should be designed to reflect the specific characteristics of the individual evaluations, but also that more analysis and experimentation are required.

Support for teachers in challenging situations as a factor of change: reflections from a continuing professional development programme in Guinea-Bissau

“…This stems from the fact that "Policymakers are not only interested in 'evidence-based policy', but also wish to judge the effectiveness of specific interventions" (Befani, Ramalingam, & Stern, 2015, p. 1). The developmental evaluations usually follow the OECD DAC criteria -relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability (Andersen, 2014;Feinstein & Beck, 2007;Picciotto, 2014). Presently there is a renewed emphasis on measurement and certain evaluation methods, particularly experimental or quasi-experimental methods.…”

Impactos e Efeitos de Programas de Cooperação para o Desenvolvimento em Escolas: Um olhar focado sobre o programa de apoio ao sistema educativo da Guiné-Bissau

“…Nos países do Sul global e na avaliação em Educação no âmbito da cooperação para o desenvolvimento, para além do papel preponderante do CAD da OCDE, o Banco Mundial também assume um papel importante, sendo estas organizações responsáveis pela criação, difusão e implementação de agendas e da promoção de "evaluation standards, guidelines and codes of ethics" (Stern, 2007, p. 309). Estas avaliações são normalmente designadas de "developmental evaluation" (Andersen, 2014;Feinstein & Beck, 2007;Picciotto, 2014). Este tipo de avaliação "is tasked to examine complex problems in diverse and ever-changing operating environments" (Picciotto, 2014, p. 6), tendo essencialmente em consideração os critérios definidos pelo CAD da OCDE -relevância, eficácia, eficiência, sustentabilidade e impacto (Feinstein & Beck, 2007;Proença, 2010).…”