2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00012-002-8188-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some universal properties of the category of clones

Abstract: In [6], O. C. García and W. Taylor asked if the breadth of the lattice of interpretability types of varieties is uncountable. The present paper solves the problem by two different constructions. Both of them show that any cardinal number is the cardinality of an antichain in the named lattice and that the existence of a proper class antichain is equivalent to the negation of Vopěnka's principle. The first construction gives in a way a minimal solution of the problem, whereas the second one gives stronger resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof It follows from Theorem 2.4 and the fact that, assuming the negation of Vopěnka's principle, the large discrete category can be fully embedded into Th (see [25], (3) after Theorem 1.1).…”
Section: Remark 35mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Proof It follows from Theorem 2.4 and the fact that, assuming the negation of Vopěnka's principle, the large discrete category can be fully embedded into Th (see [25], (3) after Theorem 1.1).…”
Section: Remark 35mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In 2002, V. Trnková and A. Barkhudaryan proved [48] that for every cardinal κ there is an antichain of power κ in L . They also proved that the existence of a proper-class antichain is equivalent to the negation of Vopěnka's principle (a proposed higher axiom of set theory).…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then an issue [2] of Memoirs of the AMS was devoted to the study of L. One of the many open problems formulated there, whether the breadth of this lattice is uncountable, was solved in [3]. The authors proved there (among other) that every poset can be embedded into L and that the existence of a proper class antichain is equivalent to the negation of Vopěnka's principle (see [4]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, our construction uses idempotent clones only, while the constructions in [3] use many constant operations. To state the main result, let us use an alternative formulation (see the next paragraph):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%