2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39007-4_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Wellposedness Results for the Ostrovsky–Hunter Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two reformulations (1.8) and (1.10) of (1.1) are not equivalent. Therefore, the well-posedness result of [5,8] does not also apply to (1.8). Finally, the Kruzkov doubling of variables works for (1.10) but not for (1.8).…”
Section: On the Functionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The two reformulations (1.8) and (1.10) of (1.1) are not equivalent. Therefore, the well-posedness result of [5,8] does not also apply to (1.8). Finally, the Kruzkov doubling of variables works for (1.10) but not for (1.8).…”
Section: On the Functionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Second, it gives an Oleinik type estimate. We show that we can replace the Kruzkov-type entropy inequalities used in [5,8] with an Oleinik-type estimate and we prove the uniqueness via a nonlocal adjoint problem. This implies that a shock wave in an entropy weak solution to the Ostrovsky-Hunter equation is admissible only if it jumps down in value (similar to the inviscid Burgers' equation).…”
Section: On the Functionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations