¿Son los criterios de realidad válidos para clasificar y discernir
entre memorias de hechos auto-experimentados y de eventos
vistos en vídeo?

Monteiro, Andréa; Vázquez, María José Domínguez; Seijo, Dolores; Fernández, Ramón Arce

doi:10.23923/j.rips.2018.02.020

Cited by 21 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although many comparisons were computed, multiple corrections test was not performed as the grouping factor had one or two levels. Effect sizes were calculated in Cohen's d and were interpreted in terms of the probability of superiority of the effect size (PS ES ; Monteiro et al, 2018). The quantity of harm on the clinical dimensions was calculated by interpreting the effects in the binomial effect size display (BESD; Rosenthal and Rubin, 1982), using r (Corrás et al, 2017).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Executive Functioning and Psychological Adjustment of Child-to-Parent Offenders: Epidemiology and Quantification of Harm

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the aim of ascertaining if child-to-parent offenders have impairments in the executive functions and psychological maladjustment, and to quantify the potential harm and epidemiology, a field study was designed. As for this, 76 juvenile offenders sentenced for child-to-parent violence were assessed in executive functions (Stroop tasks) and psychological adjustment (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent, MMPI-A). The results showed valid responses for 75 juveniles and that data were not generally biased in line with defensiveness or malingering (differential diagnosis in justice juvenile evaluations). In psychological adjustment, the results revealed a significantly higher maladjustment among offenders on all the basic clinical scales with 23% more symptoms of hysteria than the normative population, 37% more of depressive symptoms, 44% more of hypochondriac symptoms, 68% more of psychopathic deviation symptoms, 46% more of paranoid symptoms, 26% more of psychasthenic symptoms, 24% more symptoms of schizophrenia, 17% more symptoms of hypomania, and 13% more symptoms of social introversion. Epidemiologically, the prevalence rates of clinical deterioration were significantly greater than expected (0.05 in normative sample) in hypochondria (28.0%), depression (29.3%), hysteria (29.3%), psychopathic deviation (60%), paranoia (30.7%), psychasthenia (22.7%), and schizophrenia (25.3%). As for the cognitive functions, the offenders exhibited impairments estimated at 62.0% in word reading, 47.9% in color naming, 45.8% in color-word, and 11.9% in interference and a significantly higher prevalence of caseness than expected in word reading (65%), color naming (71%), and color-word (70.2%). The implications of the results for intervention are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Executive Functioning and Psychological Adjustment of Child-to-Parent Offenders: Epidemiology and Quantification of Harm

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The result of the verification of coding accuracy or true kappa was .91, which reflects an "almost perfect" (≥ .81) level of inter-coder agreement (Landis & Koch, 1977;Monteiro et al, 2018). As the true concordance between these two raters was so high, and they had been concordant with other raters in other studies (between-contexts) and, by extension, concordant over time (within-concordance), similar data would be found by trained raters in this coding system.…”

Section: Coding Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 97%

“…All the interviews were coded and rated by one of the coders, and subsequently 50% of these interviews were selected at random for an independent double coding by the second coder. Coding was completed with the verification of exact correspondence of the categorization and rating of the quotes, resulting in true intercoder concordance, as described by Monteiro, Vázquez, Seijo, and Arce (2018). This verification is necessary because otherwise two mistakes may be coded as a hit.…”

Section: Coding Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Early Narratives of Desistance from Crime in Different Prison Regimes

Rodríguez

Padrón

Redondo

2019

The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The most frequent indicator of whether or not criminals continue offending has been recidivism rates, which are, on average, around 50% (Zara & Farrington, 2016). This rate means that the remaining 50% of offenders do not re-offend. This percentage can be interpreted as the static figure of crime cessation. However, desistance from crime, albeit quantitatively inverse to the global recidivism rate (Polascheck, 2016; Walker, Bowen, & Brown, 2013), is a more complex and dynamic process than just the final result of whether a person recidivates or not. For this reason, research into desistance requires paying attention to personal and social factors throughout the lives and criminal histories of those offenders who recidivate or desist from crime (Cid & Martí, 2012; Liem & Richardson, 2014). The study of the desistance process and its related factors has gained increasing interest during recent years and given rise to a specific field of criminal analysis (Abeling-Judge, 2017). It is closely linked to both the assessment of criminal careers (Farrington, 2007) and the evaluation of offenders' desistance narratives (Maruna, 2015). The concept of "desistance narratives" refers to those stories in which people express their rupture (

show abstract

“…Also, one of the evaluators had a high degree of agreement (concordance) with the other evaluators in the categorical analysis for a previous meta-analysis (Vázquez et al (2018), indicating a high degree of inter-contextual consistency. These findings demonstrate a high degree of fidelity in the coding (Monteiro, Vázquez, Seijo, & Arce, 2018).…”

Section: •Data Extraction (Selection and Coding)mentioning

confidence: 60%

Health-related quality of life among persons with physical disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lima-Castro¹,

Blanco²,

Otero³

et al. 2020

Rev. iberoam. psicol. salud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although research suggests that people with physical disabilities experience impacts to their health-related quality of life (HRQL), there are no previous reviews or meta-analyses of studies that use appropriate assessment instruments in this population. The objective of this project was to conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies that use the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) to evaluate HRQL in people with physical disabilities. We searched the PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library databases, identifying articles published through February 2020. The methodological quality of the studies was analyzed, and the pooled mean scores for each domain of the WHOQOL-BREF were calculated. Ten studies involving 2,048 people with physical disabilities were included. Their methodological quality was adequate. The pooled mean scores were 49.5 for the physical domain, 57.7 for the psychological domain, 58.2 for the social relations domain, and 55.5 for the environmental domain. The findings of this work confirm an impact of physical disabilities on the four HRQL domains in this population.

show abstract

¿Son los criterios de realidad válidos para clasificar y discernir entre memorias de hechos auto-experimentados y de eventos vistos en vídeo?

Cited by 21 publications

References 18 publications

Evaluation of the Executive Functioning and Psychological Adjustment of Child-to-Parent Offenders: Epidemiology and Quantification of Harm

Evaluation of the Executive Functioning and Psychological Adjustment of Child-to-Parent Offenders: Epidemiology and Quantification of Harm

Early Narratives of Desistance from Crime in Different Prison Regimes

Health-related quality of life among persons with physical disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About