2000
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Song-type matching between neighbouring song sparrows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
126
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, subjects who continued to type match ('stayed on the type') responded more aggressively than did subjects who switched off type or stopped singing [18]. These results have been incorporated in a model of type matching [18,19,23] that guides the present study. In this model, initiating a type match is an aggressive escalation signal, staying on type maintains the threat intensity, and switching off type (or stopping singing) is a de-escalation signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, subjects who continued to type match ('stayed on the type') responded more aggressively than did subjects who switched off type or stopped singing [18]. These results have been incorporated in a model of type matching [18,19,23] that guides the present study. In this model, initiating a type match is an aggressive escalation signal, staying on type maintains the threat intensity, and switching off type (or stopping singing) is a de-escalation signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In their review, Searcy & Beecher [15] concluded that most attempts to demonstrate that song type matching is a threat signal may have failed precisely because it is an early-stage threat signal (usually given at a distance) which precedes the late-stage threat signals (such as soft song) that are given when the opponents are face to face. If it is true that song type matching is an early conventional signal of aggressive intent, then the experimental paradigms to date, which have used only a single high-level threat stimulus [15,19,22], will have been inadequate for determining whether song type matching reliably predicts subsequent escalation. What is needed is a design that begins with an initial low-level threat, allowing subjects to use song type matching as an early-stage threat, followed by an experimental escalation designed to see whether subjects will follow through on their initial threat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another experiment, we tested response to neighbor song by new neighbors twice during the breeding season: early, in April, and again a month and a half later (Beecher et al, 2000a). Early in the breeding season, new neighbors will have only recently established their territorial boundary, which may still be in dispute, and territorial skirmishes will have occurred recently or may still be occurring.…”
Section: Using Song Repertoires In Counter-singing Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the most plausible hypothesis is that repertoires allow birds to match, or not do so, when countersinging with neighbours (e.g. Beecher et al 2000); this is less likely where the level of sharing is low, although birds may still 'match' with similar songs (Burt et al 2002). Interactive playback has been an important recent technical advance which is helping us to understand just how individuals use their songs in relation to one another (e.g.…”
Section: The Rôle Of Small Repertoiresmentioning
confidence: 99%