2013
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Songbird frequency selectivity and temporal resolution vary with sex and season

Abstract: Many species of songbirds exhibit dramatic seasonal variation in song output. Recent evidence suggests that seasonal changes in auditory processing are coincident with seasonal variation in vocal output. Here, we show, for the first time, that frequency selectivity and temporal resolution of the songbird auditory periphery change seasonally and in a sex-specific manner. Male and female house sparrows (Passer domesticus) did not differ in their frequency sensitivity during the non-breeding season, nor did they … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the animals used in the current study were male. Since sex effects have been observed across species both in ABRs as well as EFRs (Jerger and Hall 1980;Eggermont and Don 1982;Krizman et al 2012;Gall et al 2013), the presence of such effects with these stimuli and any changes with age remain a valid avenue of investigation. The canonical correlations used in this study are sensitive only to the presence of a linear relationship amongst the variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the animals used in the current study were male. Since sex effects have been observed across species both in ABRs as well as EFRs (Jerger and Hall 1980;Eggermont and Don 1982;Krizman et al 2012;Gall et al 2013), the presence of such effects with these stimuli and any changes with age remain a valid avenue of investigation. The canonical correlations used in this study are sensitive only to the presence of a linear relationship amongst the variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threshold is then estimated as lying halfway between this stimulus intensity and the next lowest intensity (in our case, 2.5 dB below the stimulus intensity of the last detectable response). This method consistently produces evoked potential thresholds that provide the greatest agreement with thresholds estimated with single unit or behavioural estimates [17,21,29].…”
Section: (B) General Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Although often considered a relatively stable component of the auditory system, there is evidence that the peripheral auditory (ear and auditory nerve) responses can change in threshold or other neural response measures across reproductive state or following experimental manipulation of hormonal levels [15][16][17]. In the current study, we ask whether social experience in the form of exposure to conspecific vocal signals over several days could modify the auditory periphery's response to novel calls or other acoustic stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable work showing that there are seasonal and hormonally induced changes in peripheral auditory sensitivity in fish, frogs and songbirds (Coffin et al, 2012;Gall et al, 2013;Henry and Lucas, 2009;Miranda and Wilczynski, 2009;Rohmann et al, 2013;Sisneros et al, 2004;Vélez et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2012). In these taxa, breeding attempts occur seasonally and attention to matingrelated stimuli increases in importance during these times.…”
Section: Forward Masking and Socially Induced Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%