2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
310
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 343 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
310
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, vocal learning appears to have evolved independently in groups of birds and mammals [55]. The members of the mentioned avian taxa are known to naturally produce sequences of sounds with signs of 'phonological syntax', while it is a matter of debate to which degree nonhuman vocal learners exhibit signs of 'semantical syntax' [56]. It is also debated to what degree non-human primates (e.g.…”
Section: Bird Brainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, vocal learning appears to have evolved independently in groups of birds and mammals [55]. The members of the mentioned avian taxa are known to naturally produce sequences of sounds with signs of 'phonological syntax', while it is a matter of debate to which degree nonhuman vocal learners exhibit signs of 'semantical syntax' [56]. It is also debated to what degree non-human primates (e.g.…”
Section: Bird Brainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doupe and Kuhl (1999) provide an overview of the evidence for vocal learning in a particular species, which involves the following properties: (i) initially immature vocalizations ("babbling") that eventually become adultlike; (ii) a relatively fixed individual-level repertoire that varies across individuals/groups; (iii) individual-level differences that depend on experience/exposure; and (iv) the necessity of auditory feedback to maintain normal vocalizations. The behavioral evidence for vocal learning in songbirds and parallels to human first language acquisition have been reviewed widely in the literature (see e.g., Doupe and Kuhl, 1999;Bolhuis et al, 2010;Berwick et al, 2011), and I will not recap those arguments here. Schachner et al (2009) discuss a relatively new line of research investigating the connection between vocal learning and spontaneous rhythmic motor entrainment, or the ability to align movement with auditory input (i.e., move to a beat or dance).…”
Section: Vocal Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A winter wren may know 5-10 distinct songs, each lasting 10 s, whereas each starling may know up to 100 motifs and combine some of them in a song bout that is 30 s to a minute long (Yip, 2006). Nightingales and mockingbirds may have larger repertoires of hundreds of songs (Marler, 2000;Berwick et al, 2011), organized into less than a dozen "packages" of bouts that are typically produced together (Todt and Hultsch, 1996). It is important to note that notes and syllables do not have any meaning.…”
Section: Hierarchical Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zebra finch vocalizations are made up of acoustic units known as 'syllables', which are arranged in different ways in a rulegoverned fashion, producing a wide variety of sequences. Birdsong thus shows similarities to human language that go beyond vocal learning (Berwick et al 2011). However, there is no evidence yet that songbirds attach meaning to syllables, or the way in which they are arranged, which limits the utility of birdsong as a model for human language.…”
Section: Insights From Animal Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%