2001
DOI: 10.1021/la010421+
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonochemical Synthesis of Functionalized Amorphous Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

Abstract: Sonochemical decomposition of Fe(CO)5 was carried out in the presence of different surfactants. The reactions give stable colloids of undecenoate, dodecyl sulfonate, and octyl phosphonate coated Fe2O3 nanoparticles of 5-16 nm in diameter. The ionic binding of the surfactants to the nanoparticle surfaces was confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy. Electron paramagnetic resonance measurements, magnetization curves, and zero-field cooled and field cooled studies indicate that the as-prepared amorphous nanoparticles are s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

9
131
2
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
9
131
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 12 shows the most stable structures derived from the interaction of CPPA with the investigated surfaces (see Supporting Information for the other configurations investigated). First of all we can observe on the (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) and (0001)-Zn surfaces a strong H-bonding interaction of the PO termination with a surface hydroxyl group, while on the (10-10) surface this interaction is not active ( Table 2).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 12 shows the most stable structures derived from the interaction of CPPA with the investigated surfaces (see Supporting Information for the other configurations investigated). First of all we can observe on the (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) and (0001)-Zn surfaces a strong H-bonding interaction of the PO termination with a surface hydroxyl group, while on the (10-10) surface this interaction is not active ( Table 2).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By contrast, the (10-10) surface is slightly less stabilized (−22.6 kcal/mol) The difference in the energy stabilization obtained on the (10-10) surface compared with the other two surfaces (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) and (0001) is mainly due to the different H bonding between surface and CPPA molecule (one H bond with PO and with C−O on the (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) and (0001)-Zn surfaces and two H bonds with C−O on the (10-10) surface; see Table 2). …”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations