2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2341-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonoelastography for 1786 non-palpable breast masses: diagnostic value in the decision to biopsy

Abstract: • Sonoelastography has higher specificity than B-mode ultrasound in distinguishing benign from malignant masses. • Sonoelastography could potentially help reduce the number of biopsies with benign results. • Lesion stiffness on sonoelastography correlated with the malignant potential of the lesion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
44
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The specificity of ultrasound alone ranges between 7.1-98.8%. 1 The positive predictive value was 8.4-13.7% for biopsies performed as a result of screening studies which is much lower than the optimal positive predictive value of 25-40% achieved at mammographic screening. 2 Since then other modalities have been investigated to aid in distinguishing benign from malignant diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The specificity of ultrasound alone ranges between 7.1-98.8%. 1 The positive predictive value was 8.4-13.7% for biopsies performed as a result of screening studies which is much lower than the optimal positive predictive value of 25-40% achieved at mammographic screening. 2 Since then other modalities have been investigated to aid in distinguishing benign from malignant diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Sonoelastography arises as a non invasive method of imaging to evaluate tissue stiffness, it has been used to improve diagnostic confidence and increased specificity of conventional sonography. Therefore unnecessary short term follow up or biopsies were able to be reduced [34][35][36].…”
Section: E Score 5 (E5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sonoelastography arises as a non invasive method of imaging to evaluate tissue stiffness, it has been used to improve diagnostic confidence and increased specificity of conventional sonography. Therefore unnecessary short term follow up or biopsies were able to be reduced [34][35][36].On the other hand, SWE measured tissue stiffness by Young´s modulus (as we defined before) which is expressed in pressure units, usually in kilopascals (kPa). In SWE, shear waves created by ultrasound system propagate in tissue at speeds of 1-10mm/ sec, equivalent to a 1-300kPa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a variety of manufacturers have begun to incorporate elastography, a realtime tissue stiffness measuring technique in ultrasound equipment. In the breast, cancers tend to be stiffer than benign lesions, and elastography has also been reported to improve the specificity for the diagnosis of solid breast masses (2)(3)(4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%