2006
DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonographic and mammographic appearances of granular cell tumors of the breast with pathological correlation

Abstract: Breast imagers should be aware that GCT of the breast is an uncommon differential in a minority of neoplasms that can be mistaken for breast cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
38
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
38
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Microcalcifications are not normally a feature of GCTs. On ultrasound, GCTs can present as solid, poorly marginated lesions with marked posterior shadowing or as more benign-appearing well-circumscribed solid masses (8,9). MRI findings in a patient with GCT were described by Scaranelo et al (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Microcalcifications are not normally a feature of GCTs. On ultrasound, GCTs can present as solid, poorly marginated lesions with marked posterior shadowing or as more benign-appearing well-circumscribed solid masses (8,9). MRI findings in a patient with GCT were described by Scaranelo et al (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Mammography usually reveals a stellate, speculated mass, without calcifications, but can also show a round, well-circumscribed mass. Ultrasound usually shows a solid, poorly marginated mass with posterior shadowing, even if a more benign-appearing mass can be seen [9]. Not even magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown specific patterns allowing differentiating GCTB from cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At ultrasound, GCT may manifest as a solid, poorly marginated mass with marked posterior acoustic shadowing (4), alternatively it may have a benign appearance as a well-circumscribed solid mass (5,6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%