Assessment of intracranial pressure (ICP) is essential in the management of acute intracranial catastrophe to limit or actively reduce ICP. This article provides background information and reviews the current literature on methods of measuring ICP in children. Indications for ICP measurement are described for children with traumatic brain injury, shunt insertion or malfunction, arachnoid cyst, craniosynostosis, and prematurity. Various methods of ICP monitoring are detailed: non-invasive, indirect (lumbar puncture, visualevoked potentials, fontanelle compression, and optic nerve sheath), and direct assessment (ventricular cannulation, and epidural, subdural, and intraparenchymal devices). Normal levels of ICP will depend on the age and position of the child during monitoring. This article provides clinical and research-based evidence in this area where there is currently limited guidance.One of the frequent questions about neurological critical care of children relates to indications and methods for measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP) and the appropriate therapy for raised ICP. 1 Literature on methods of measuring ICP in children is relatively rare and there is no clear guidance on when and where to measure ICP in routine clinical practice. Advances in monitoring technology and new microsensor tips of minimally invasive catheters have improved the ease, safety, and accuracy of ICP measurement, allowing more widespread use in emergency and elective situations.Interpreting results of ICP measurement should remain in the hands of experienced clinicians and must never stand for themselves when taking into account clinical history and clinical symptoms. This review is targeted to give a clinically orientated overview of daily practice of ICP monitoring in a variety of situations. 2,3 Historical background The most simple and longest-standing method of measuring ICP is to perform a lumbar puncture and to observe the opening and closing pressure. This indirect and, at the same time, imprecise procedure is still commonly used. However, as a technique it has significant disadvantages and inaccuracies.Recognition of these problems led Lundberg et al. to develop intraventricular pressure monitoring in the 1960s. 4-6 Lundberg et al. also described the various wave patterns associated with intracranial pathology. 4-6 Ventricular catheterization 2-3 remains the criterion standard for ICP measurement today, but it was recognized early on that there were problems, especially with infection, which limited the length of usage of such monitoring, and there were often technical difficulties with cannulating a compressed or deviated ventricle in situations where ICP was raised.In an attempt to overcome the difficulties associated with ventricular ICP measurement, a variety of extra-ventricular devices were developed during the next 20 years, including subdural devices based on saline-filled transducers (e.g.