2013
DOI: 10.7863/ultra.32.7.1199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonographic Evaluation of the Iliotibial Band at the Lateral Femoral Epicondyle

Abstract: Sonographic evaluation of the ITB in our study population clearly revealed anteroposterior motion of the ITB relative to the LFE during knee flexion-extension. Our results indicate that the ITB does in fact move relative to the femur during the functional ranges of knee motion. Future investigations examining ITB motion in symptomatic populations may provide further insight into the pathophysiologic mechanisms of ITB syndrome and facilitate the development of more effective treatment strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the knee was placed in 45° of knee flexion with use of a goniometer and the presence and location of fluid was again recorded. Knee flexion values of 25° and 45° were chosen based on the fact that the ITB translates posteriorly over the lateral femoral epicondyle within this range of knee flexion [13]. This was important given that the location of fluid relative to the ITB was determined at the level of the lateral femoral epicondyle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the knee was placed in 45° of knee flexion with use of a goniometer and the presence and location of fluid was again recorded. Knee flexion values of 25° and 45° were chosen based on the fact that the ITB translates posteriorly over the lateral femoral epicondyle within this range of knee flexion [13]. This was important given that the location of fluid relative to the ITB was determined at the level of the lateral femoral epicondyle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple risk factors have been identified, but overuse during running and cycling activities is most commonly associated with ITBS [1,2,4]. Although the precise pathoetiology of ITBS has not been defined, researchers have hypothesized that cyclical iliotibial band (ITB) motion during running and cycling may produce symptoms via 2 mechanisms: (1) anteroposterior ITB motion over the lateral femoral epicondyle resulting in frictional, translatory stresses, or (2) medial-lateral ITB movement resulting in compression-related stresses [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. These pathoetiologic mechanisms are not necessarily mutually exclusive, and common to both is the development of irritative stresses on the ITB and the underlying tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Une rétraction du fascia lata peut être recherchée par le test d'Ober sur un patient en décubitus latéral sur le côté sain, hanche et genou sains à 90° de flexion: le patient a des difficultés à réaliser une adduction de la cuisse (genou à 90°) au-delà de la ligne médiane, avec apparition d'une douleur de la face latérale du genou [21]. L'imagerie n'a pas d'intérêt dans les formes typiques, en dehors de l'échographie dynamique ; en effet celle-ci a permis de démontrerchez des coureurs à pied asymptomatiques -que la bandelette iliotibiale a une mobilité antéropostérieure par rapport au condyle latéral dans l'arc de mobilité 0-45° en charge et en décharge combinée à une réduction de sa largeur [23], associée à un épanchement liquidien sous la bandelette dont la présence varie selon la position (95% en charge et en extension vs 22% à 30° de flexion), en rapport possible avec une extension du récessus latéral synovial [24]: cet épanchement n'est donc pas toujours synonyme d'un SBIT. En pratique, la sensibilité de l'échographie dans le bilan d'un SBIT est faible.…”
Section: Syndrome De La Bandelette Iliotibialeunclassified
“…The repetitive knee flexion with running, cycling, other sports, and military activities is thought to create friction of the ITB over the lateral femoral epicondyle at approximately 25° of knee flexion 3 . The movement of the ITB in reference to the lateral femoral epicondyle has been confirmed utilizing dynamic ultrasound imaging at 0°, 30° and 45° of knee flexion 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%