The uterine scare after caesarean section and "niche" also called "isthmocoele" and their specific morphologic features may be associated with specific further gynecological and obstetrical complications . Abnormal uterine bleeding, subfertility, risk of scar pregnancy and uterine rupture during pregnancy and delivery are considered as potential indications for hysteroscopic or laparoscopic correction of cesarean scar; however, there is a lack of robust evidence that surgery is justified by specific niche morphology, symptoms, and risks. Despite of the lack of appropriate studies with control of untreated patients, a significant barrier to build evidence is the lack of reliable diagnostics. Recently, a step for standardization of the nomenclature and ultrasound measurements has been made . Some researchers agreed that there is not a preference for a specific ultrasound technique to be used, and transvaginal ultrasound with the sagittal and transversal view for specific niche measurements are suggested. The experts also agree that using contrast agents during the scan (normally gel or saline) have added value in the assessment of niche if fluid is not present naturally in niche . Role of three-dimensional ultrasound were not a subject of this consensus, probably because it was focused on basic niche assessment. Recently, the use of three-dimensional saline contrast sonohysterography and SonoHysteroAVC technique was described as promising in assessment of uterus and uterine cavity . We here are sharing our initial experience with three-dimensional sonohysterography and SonoHysteroAVC for niche assessment in clinical practice and research. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.