Sonographic Follow-Up after Pyeloplasty: A Large, Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Abstract

Purpose Routine scintigraphy after surgery for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is discouraged, making ultrasound the preferred option for follow up. Yet, interpretation of sonographic parameters is rarely straightforward. Methods We reviewed 111 cases including 97 pyeloplasty (52 open, 45 laparoscopic) and 14 pyelopexy, during a 7-year period. Pre- and postoperative pelvic Antero-Posterior Diameter (APD), Cortical Thickness (CT) and Pelvic/Cortex Ratio (PCR) was measured serially. Results 85% were free of symptoms by 1 year. Only 11% had complete resolution of hydronephrosis. Eleven (10.4%) needed a redo procedure. Mean reduction in APD was 32.6%, 45.8%, and 51.7% at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months respectively. CT increased by an average 55.9%, 75.6% and 107.6% while PCR reduced by 6.9, 8.0 and 8.8 at given intervals. Comparison of open and laparoscopic procedures showed no significant difference. Review of failed pyeloplasty showed failure of reduction in APD (APD > 3cm or < 25% reduction) and PCR (PCR > 4) as early indicators for failure. Conclusion Both APD and PCR are reliable indicators of success and failure following pyeloplasty while CT alone is not as useful. Laparoscopic procedures are non-inferior to standard open surgery.

Functional outcome after transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty at a tertiary care center, Nepal

“…20,21 Therefore the drainage curve pattern is a good indicator to verify the degree of obstruction and success of treatment rather than relying only on DRF. 27 Our study showed a decrease of GFR as well as DRF in one case after sub-analysis of renal function of the operated kidney. The renal biopsy an invasive diagnostic test is not routinely performed at the time of pyeloplasty.…”