2008
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.5.701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonographic Nomogram of the Fetal Calf Between 15 and 42 Weeks’ Gestation Using 3-Dimensional Sonography

Abstract: The data provide a nomogram of calf width with a direct correlation between muscle growth and gestational age. This nomogram can offer a basis for normal calf development and may assist in distinguishing between different etiologies leading to clubfoot and other joint contractures associated with calf atrophy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two obstetricians one junior and one senior, blinded to the outcome examined the stored images and calculated the following parameters (in accordance with those previously reported), as shown in Figure 1 3. the ratio between tibia length and calf width (T/C), measured at the upper third of the tibial bone from the posterior boundary of the tibia toward the posterior peripheral skin. 9 There were concordant measurement results for both operators, so the widest angle or the higher ratio was chosen. Whenever the clubfoot was bilateral, the side with the worst parameter was chosen for analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Two obstetricians one junior and one senior, blinded to the outcome examined the stored images and calculated the following parameters (in accordance with those previously reported), as shown in Figure 1 3. the ratio between tibia length and calf width (T/C), measured at the upper third of the tibial bone from the posterior boundary of the tibia toward the posterior peripheral skin. 9 There were concordant measurement results for both operators, so the widest angle or the higher ratio was chosen. Whenever the clubfoot was bilateral, the side with the worst parameter was chosen for analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retrospective evaluation was performed on all cases where a multiplanar view of the fetal leg had been obtained at a second trimester scan using a volumetric US probe (GE E8, GE Voluson 730, Medical Systems, Zipf, Austria), and postnatal outcome and follow‐up were both available. Two obstetricians one junior and one senior, blinded to the outcome examined the stored images and calculated the following parameters (in accordance with those previously reported), as shown in Figure 1: the angle between the long axis of the foot and of the lower leg (Angle), with no angle considered normal, <80° mildly abnormal, 80°‐100° moderate, and >100° severe 7 ; the width, length and width‐to‐length ratio (W/L) of the foot, correlated with gestational age through linear equations 8 ; the ratio between tibia length and calf width (T/C), measured at the upper third of the tibial bone from the posterior boundary of the tibia toward the posterior peripheral skin 9 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations