2016
DOI: 10.7863/ultra.15.06104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonography for Complete Evaluation of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Central Support Devices

Abstract: The effectiveness of sonography was excellent for evaluation of umbilical arterial and venous catheters, endotracheal tubes, and peripherally inserted central venous catheters. These results support the goal of further point-of-care training and accreditation to use sonography as a primary modality for complete evaluation of NICU support devices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
60
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Saul et al described their experience using US for ETT, umbilical line, and peripherally inserted central line positions with a mean scan time of 7 minutes and less, and with > 90% successful identification rates for all examinations. 18 The benefits of US in regard to minimal patient manipulation and lack of radiation exposure warrants further investigation even if the time needed for the examination is ultimately similar to XR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 Saul et al described their experience using US for ETT, umbilical line, and peripherally inserted central line positions with a mean scan time of 7 minutes and less, and with > 90% successful identification rates for all examinations. 18 The benefits of US in regard to minimal patient manipulation and lack of radiation exposure warrants further investigation even if the time needed for the examination is ultimately similar to XR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Saul et al accomplished a mean US scan time of 7 minutes but did not report XR time for comparison. 18 Alonso Quintela et al compared US to capnography and XR for ETT positioning in their NICU and pediatric ICU. 13 The authors found no significant differences between US and capnography in detecting endotracheal versus esophageal intubation in neonates; however, US was significantly slower than capnography, 34 versus 7 seconds, respectively.…”
Section: Ultrasound Versus Other Modalities To Determine Endotrachealmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 An abdominal US or echocardiography is more sensitive and accurate for detecting UV catheter malposition than is radiography. 17,19 US is more precise than radiography because it allows direct visualization of the UV catheter tip in relation to internal vascular structures 9,20 The results of this study show that real-time US enables the location of the UV catheter tip to be confirmed 9,10,14 and prevents HE after UVC, supporting the conclusions of previous reports, which have affirmed that US is reliable and may replace radiography for the identification of UV catheter position, preventing complications resulting from malpositioning and reducing exposure to ionizing radiation. 16 US assessment is operator-dependent, which requires a lot of practice and clinical experience to reach the diagnostic level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound sensitivity in the present evaluation was 100%, with a specificity of 89.5%, PPV of 97.3%, and NPV of 100%. Saul et al reported both the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound as 100% (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%