Sonority-Related Novel Word Learning Ability of Children With Cochlear Implants With Optimal Oral Language Exposure

Abstract

Objectives: The present study investigated how children with cochlear implants (CIs), with optimal exposure to oral language, perform on sonority-related novel word learning tasks. By optimal oral language exposure, we refer to bilateral cochlear implantation below the age of 2 years. Sonority is the relative perceptual prominence/loudness of speech sounds of the same length, stress, and pitch. The present study is guided by a previous study that investigated the sonority-related novel word learning ability of a group of children with CIs, in the Greek language, of which the majority were implanted beyond the age of 2 unilaterally. Design: A case-control study with 15 Dutch-speaking participants in each of the three groups, i.e., children with CIs, normal-hearing children (NHC), and normal-hearing adults, was conducted using a sonority-related novel “CVC” word learning task. All children with CIs are implanted before the age of 2 years with preimplant hearing aids. Thirteen out of the 15 children had bilateral CIs. The CVC words were constructed according to four sonority conditions, where N is nonsonorous and S is a sonorous phoneme: NSN, NSS, SSN, and SSS. Outcome measures were accuracy and reaction times (RTs). In addition, the Peabody picture vocabulary test and the digit span forward test were administered to the children. Results: There were no statistical differences in accuracy or RTs between the children groups on the overall score and across the different conditions. However, children with CIs, unlike NHC, scored statistically less accurately and with longer RTs relative to normal-hearing adults, on the overall task. Within-group comparisons showed that none of the groups performed statistically differently on any of the conditions. The NHC showed higher receptive vocabulary scores relative to children with CIs. In addition, the group of children with CIs entailed a statistically significantly higher number of children with “weak” short-term memory. Conclusions: Children with CIs who have optimal oral language exposure showed age-appropriate sonority-related novel word learning abilities and strategies relative to their NH peers. However, children with CIs continue to show lower receptive vocabulary scores than NHC, despite the equivalent novel word learning ability. This suggests that children with CIs may have difficulties in retaining newly learned words. Future work should look into possible causes of the gap in performance. This would eventually aid in rehabilitation tailored to the needs of the individual.

A meta-analysis of 97 studies reveals that statistical learning and language ability are only weakly correlated

“…We only included papers that correlated individual differences in SL ability to an independent measure of language skills. Studies exclusively reporting a neural measure of SL (e.g., Liu et al, 2021) or using participants with acquired brain dysfunction (i.e., post-stroke aphasia; Schevenels et al, 2022) or hearing loss (Hamza et al, 2020;Monroy et al, 2022) were omitted from further analysis. We also chose to omit studies that did not use an independent test of SL and language abilities (e.g., Brice et al, 2021;.…”

Resting-state occipito-frontal alpha connectome is linked to differential word learning ability in adult learners

“…In other words, adults vary in their ability to both learn and retain novel words, yet the origin of this inter-individual word learning variability remains elusive to date. Word learning ability is generally held as the capability to establish connections between novel words and their semantic referents ( Kaushanskaya et al, 2013 ; Borgström et al, 2015 , 2016 ; Hamza et al, 2020 ). In recent studies, different variants of (auditory or visual) paired-associate learning tasks, for example word-meaning association task ( Krug et al, 2002 ; McDermott and Zerr, 2019 ) and word-picture/object association task ( Peñaloza et al, 2016 ; Lany, 2018 ), have been adopted to measure word learning ability.…”