1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0082-0784(85)80576-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soot formation in shock-tube oxidation of hydrocarbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…together with a chemical loss path H + C6H5Cl → products (6) which, by contrast to reaction 1, is not addition, and loss of H via (2). The corresponding rate law …”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…together with a chemical loss path H + C6H5Cl → products (6) which, by contrast to reaction 1, is not addition, and loss of H via (2). The corresponding rate law …”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data for k6 are highly scattered, with an uncertainty comparable to the magnitude of k6, but they indicate that k6 < 10 -13 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 . If overall loss (6) corresponded to one or more elementary paths, its rate constant would have to be at least equal to that for Cl-atom abstraction…”
Section: In An Intermediate Temperature Region With T ~ 580 -635 K Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…81 In order to isolate the direct effects of fuel molecular structure from those of the combustion phasing, many experimental studies on particulate formation have been conducted under carefully controlled conditions such as laboratory flames, [82][83][84][85][86] shock tubes [87][88][89][90] and flow reactors. [91][92][93] Smoke point tests have been widely used as a metric to determine the sooting tendencies of fuels and involve the measurement of the height at which soot is visibly seen to emerge from the tip of a wick-fed diffusion-type flame; a lower smoke point indicates a higher tendency to form soot.…”
Section: Particulate Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, previous shock tube measurements of soot formation have been done with gas-phase species highly diluted in argon and (sometimes) nitrogen. Fuels that have been considered include methane {Lester and Wittig, 1975;Wittig et al, 1990), acetylene {Böhm et al, 1998Cundall et al, 1978;Frenklach et al, 1984aFrenklach et al, , 1984bFussey et al, 1978;Knorre et al, 1996), ethylene {Cundall et al, 1978Fussey et al, 1978), ethane {Fussey et al, 1978), benzene {Böhm et al, 1998Frenklach et al, 1984a;Knorre et al, 1996;Simmons andWilliams, 1988), n-heptane {Kellerer et al, 1996;Kellerer and Wittig, 1997;Yao et al, 1995), and toluene {Frenklach et al, 1983, 1984aKellerer and Wittig, 1997;Rawlins et al, 1984;Simmons and Williams, 1988;Wang et al, 1981). Miscellaneous compounds such as phenyl iodide {Graham and Homer, 1973), ethylbenzene and cycloheptatriene {Graham et al, 1975), allene and 1,3-butadiene {Frenklach et al, 1984a, and iron pentacarbonyl {Tanke et al, 1998), among others, have also been studied.…”
Section: Background Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%