2006
DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910.27.1.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOPRoxi

Abstract: In Italy, postvention models specifically designed for people surviving the suicide of a loved one are very scarce. The SOPRoxi project was developed to respond to this particular lack. By involving different professional and nonprofessional figures (GPs, mental health professionals, social workers, volunteers, etc), the SOPRoxi project aims to remove the stigma associated with this condition and to offer adequate, multifaceted help to survivors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between 2015 and 2017, eligible SSs were recruited consecutively from user of SOPROXI Project (40, 41). Soproxi project (www.soproxi.it) was established in Padua, Italy, in 2006, to offer information, support, treatment provision, awareness-building and educational campaigns, to people -mainly relatives and friends- who have experienced the suicide of someone close.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 2015 and 2017, eligible SSs were recruited consecutively from user of SOPROXI Project (40, 41). Soproxi project (www.soproxi.it) was established in Padua, Italy, in 2006, to offer information, support, treatment provision, awareness-building and educational campaigns, to people -mainly relatives and friends- who have experienced the suicide of someone close.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SOPRoxi is a non-governmental, non-profit, voluntary organization, which started operating in 2006 at the Department of Mental Health of Padova (Scocco, Frasson, Costacurta, & Pavan, 2006), in the north-east of Italy. The project has rapidly grown and now operates in Italy on a nationwide basis (Scocco, Toffol, Totaro, Castriotta, & Ferrari, 2017).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While compared with non-bereaved controls, they showed no confidence in the persons in their network any more (Farberow, Gallagher-Thompson, Gilewski, & Thompson, 1992b). Some researchers thought that persons who were close to the deceased were at heightened risk for complicated grief or other psychosocial consequences (Mitchell, Kim, Prigerson, & Mortimer-Stephens, 2004; Prigerson, Bierhals, Kasl, Reynolds, Shear, Day, et al, 1997; Scocco, Frasson, Costacurta, & Pavan, 2006), and the familial transmission of suicidal behavior had been demonstrated (Brent, Oquendo, Birmaher, Greenhill, Kolko, Stanley, et al, 2002; Melhem, Brebt, Ziegler, Iyengar, Kolko, Oquendo, et al, 2007). In this study, we want to know whether there are differences in attitudes toward suicide between the informants of suicides and the informants of living controls, between the family members of suicides and the family members of non-suicides, and between the family members of suicides and non-family members of suicides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%