2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption and transport of sulfamethazine in agricultural soils amended with invasive-plant-derived biochar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, few studies exist on the creation and evaluation of biochar from invasive plant species. Studies that looked at biochar from invasive plant species either created a value‐added product (Liao et al, 2013) or used the charred material to reduce the mobility of contaminants in soil (Rajapaksha et al, 2014; Vithanage et al, 2014) and water (Ahmad et al, 2013; Zhang et al, 2015). There is scant research examining the use of biochar from invasive plant species in an agricultural context.…”
Section: Elemental Composition and Ph Of Melaleuca Quinquenervia Biocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few studies exist on the creation and evaluation of biochar from invasive plant species. Studies that looked at biochar from invasive plant species either created a value‐added product (Liao et al, 2013) or used the charred material to reduce the mobility of contaminants in soil (Rajapaksha et al, 2014; Vithanage et al, 2014) and water (Ahmad et al, 2013; Zhang et al, 2015). There is scant research examining the use of biochar from invasive plant species in an agricultural context.…”
Section: Elemental Composition and Ph Of Melaleuca Quinquenervia Biocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Compared to the biochar-free soil, the Freundlich sorption coefficient (K F ) of the 4 wt% biochar amended soil increased from 25.44 mg 1Àn L n kg À1 to 73.37 mg 1Àn for BPA, and from 66.71 mg 1Àn L n kg À1 to 152.60 mg 1Àn L n kg À1 for EE2, indicating signicant increases of 188% and 129%, respectively (Table 3). 40 Compared to the biochar-free soil, the Freundlich sorption coefficient (K F ) of the 4 wt% biochar amended soil increased from 25.44 mg 1Àn L n kg À1 to 73.37 mg 1Àn for BPA, and from 66.71 mg 1Àn L n kg À1 to 152.60 mg 1Àn L n kg À1 for EE2, indicating signicant increases of 188% and 129%, respectively (Table 3).…”
Section: Sorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biochar usually has a wide range of chemical compositions and surface properties depending on the biomass type, the heating rate, the residence time and the pyrolysis temperature [7]. Biochar is successfully utilized to mitigate climate change, improve soil fertility, and remove various contaminants in aqueous solutions as an alternative adsorbent, including heavy metals, excessive nutrients, and pharmaceuticals [8][9][10][11][12]. In comparison with an activated carbon, the manufacturing of biochar requires less energy and no pre-or post-activation processes, although it has a high adsorption ability and capacity [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%