1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb07677.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption Isotherms and Drying Rates for Mullet Fillet and Roe

Abstract: Desorption isotherms at 25°C and 43°C and adsorption isotherms at 25°C were determined for salted and unsalted female roe of mullet (Mugil cephalus). Isotherms for ground white muscle of mullet were also determined for desorption at 25"C, 43'C, and 54.5'C, and for adsorption at 25'C. Adsorption-desorption hysteresis was evident for the sigmoid shaped isotherms. At 45°C and 15% RH, and also at 45'C and 25% RH, mullet fillets dry almost four times faster than mullet roe. An air temperature lower than 45°C should… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) indicated that the critical moisture contents were 7.8 and 16.8%, which equilibrated at 65 and 75% RH for dehydrated and defatted egg protein concentrates, respectively. Chau et al (1982) studied sorption isotherms and drying rates for both fillet and roe of mullet fish and concluded that fillets were dehydrated four times faster than roes and the migration of water was within the roes rather than at the roe surface.…”
Section: Emc-rh Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) indicated that the critical moisture contents were 7.8 and 16.8%, which equilibrated at 65 and 75% RH for dehydrated and defatted egg protein concentrates, respectively. Chau et al (1982) studied sorption isotherms and drying rates for both fillet and roe of mullet fish and concluded that fillets were dehydrated four times faster than roes and the migration of water was within the roes rather than at the roe surface.…”
Section: Emc-rh Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values for hard red spring wheat at 25"C, 3O"C, 35"C, and 50°C were taken from Day and Nelson (1965); for rough rice at lO"C, 2O"C, 25"C, 3O"C, and 40°C from Zuritz et al (1979); for rough rice medium, at 4O"C, 5O"C, 60°C and 70°C from Aguerre et al (1983); for anise seed, marjoram and thyme at 5"C, 25"C, and 45'C from Wolf et al (1973); for corn at 4.4"C, 15.6"C, 3O"C, 5O"C, and 60°C from Hall and Rodriguez-Arias (1958); for mullet at 25"C, 43'C, and 54.5"C from Chau et al (1982).…”
Section: Experimental Isotherms Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation between Fig. 2a-AHIAS relationship for water sorption in different foods and related products: l wheat (Day and Nelson,7965); 0 rough rice (Zuritz et al, 7979;Aguerre et al, 1983); A anise seed (Wolf et al, 1973); A mullet (Chau et al, 1982); 0 marjoram (Wolf et al, 1973); m corn (Hall and Rodriguez-Arias, 1958); 0 thyme (Wolf et al, 1973). the isostetic heat (AH) and differential entropy (AS) of sorption is given by the following equation (Everett, 1950a):…”
Section: Calculation Of the Enthalpy And Entropy Of Sorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%