2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption materials for arsenic removal from water:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
116
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
116
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, adsorption process is cost-effective, flexible, and easy to design and operate. Several types of absorbent including iron-containing granular activated carbon (GAC) (Gu et al 2005), iron-containing fly ash (Yi et al 2009), iron-impregnated AC (Ghanizadeh et al 2010;Vaughan and Reed 2005), zirconium-loaded AC (Daus et al 2004;Peraniemi et al 1994), silver and copperimpregnated AC (Rajakovic 1992), and zinc-preloaded magnetite nanoparticle (Yang et al 2010) have been used for the removal of arsenic from the water/wastewater system. In order to enhance the process economy, the production of adsorbents from low-cost renewable biomass is usually encouraged as the surface modification of these adsorbents can further enhance the adsorptive removal of toxicants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, adsorption process is cost-effective, flexible, and easy to design and operate. Several types of absorbent including iron-containing granular activated carbon (GAC) (Gu et al 2005), iron-containing fly ash (Yi et al 2009), iron-impregnated AC (Ghanizadeh et al 2010;Vaughan and Reed 2005), zirconium-loaded AC (Daus et al 2004;Peraniemi et al 1994), silver and copperimpregnated AC (Rajakovic 1992), and zinc-preloaded magnetite nanoparticle (Yang et al 2010) have been used for the removal of arsenic from the water/wastewater system. In order to enhance the process economy, the production of adsorbents from low-cost renewable biomass is usually encouraged as the surface modification of these adsorbents can further enhance the adsorptive removal of toxicants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional technologies for arsenic removal from waters are based on processes of coagulation, sorption, ion-exchange reactions or methods of reverse osmosis. Materials used in these processes are Fe (0), Fe (III) oxyhydroxides, Mn (II), Al (III), apatite, silicate sands, carbonates, sulphides, ash or various types of coal (Chmielewská et al, 2008;Daus et al, 2004;DeMarco et al, 2003;Hiller et al, 2007;Lin and Wu, 2001;Sato et al, 2002;Song et al, 2006). Nowadays, there is a trend to use the alternative and low-cost materials for arsenic removal from the waters in laboratory or medium-scale experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arsenic in water can be effectively removed by using a variety of conventional treatment processes, including reverse osmosis [4], coagulation/ chemical precipitation [5,6], solvent extraction [7], ultrafiltration [8,9], ion-exchange [10] and adsorption [11]. Adsorption method is a conventional technique that can be used effectively for the removal of heavy metals by using different adsorbents [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%