2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption, mechanism, and behavior of sulfate on various adsorbents: A critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MZ corresponds to a zeolite-based adsorbent of sulfate, acting faster and displaying superior adsorption capacities. It should be noted that its adsorption efficiency is lower than other reported materials for sulfate removal [69,70]. However, many of these materials are synthetic (mainly polymers) and not friendly to the environment, so in this sense the product developed in this work has a composition equivalent to soils and sediments with a marginal amount of polycation, reaching a maximum of 0.1 mg per gram of zeolite.…”
Section: Adsorption Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…MZ corresponds to a zeolite-based adsorbent of sulfate, acting faster and displaying superior adsorption capacities. It should be noted that its adsorption efficiency is lower than other reported materials for sulfate removal [69,70]. However, many of these materials are synthetic (mainly polymers) and not friendly to the environment, so in this sense the product developed in this work has a composition equivalent to soils and sediments with a marginal amount of polycation, reaching a maximum of 0.1 mg per gram of zeolite.…”
Section: Adsorption Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Under the two pH conditions, DHA and coffee DOC have very similar abilities in precipitating S complexes (up to 25%). The formation of Fe/Al (hydroxide)-DOC complexes during the addition of DHA or coffee DOC could provide adsorption sites for sulfate (Tamrat et al 2019, Sadeghalvad et al 2021, which are dominant in AS soil drainage (Green et al 2007) and counted as total S measurements in solution. In addition, the removal of S and Fe, restricts the formation of problematic Fe species such as schwertmannite (Fitzpatrick et al 2017) and akaganeite (Shahabi-Ghahfarokhi et al 2022) in acidic settings.…”
Section: Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main sources of sulfate in natural water are chemical weathering and the oxidation processes of sulfur-containing minerals [1]. However, their concentration in water bodies has been increasing over time, due to the discharge of industrial effluents such as those from acid mine drainage, pharmaceutical wastewater, printing and dyeing [2]. Although the sulfate ion is often considered nontoxic, high concentrations of sulfate ions in water can cause an imbalance in the natural sulfur cycle in the ecosystem and endanger human health with prolonged ingestion, causing a laxative effect, dehydration and gastrointestinal irritation [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%