2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.09.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption of Sb(III) on carbon steel surface in presence of molybdate and selenite in citric acid medium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The S 2p peak was observed near 161.50 eV. The peak positions of Sb and S were similar to those reported in the existing literature [30][31][32][33], indicating that the phase representing the volatile was Sb 2 S 3 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The S 2p peak was observed near 161.50 eV. The peak positions of Sb and S were similar to those reported in the existing literature [30][31][32][33], indicating that the phase representing the volatile was Sb 2 S 3 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The S 2p peak was observed near 161.50 eV. The peak positions of Sb and S were similar to those reported in the existing literature [30][31][32][33], indicating that the phase representing the volatile was Sb2S3. The high-resolution XPS spectrum of S 2p is presented in Figure 10a, and the S 2p peak was observed near 160.90 eV.…”
Section: Volatilization Reaction 421 Xps Analysissupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The Cu substrate has a terrace pattern and the terrace sites will serve as the nucleation center for the Sb deposit. Additionally, the interplay between nucleation and growth of Sb would be influenced by citric acid . Citric acid molecules will chelate Sb 3+ ions to form a complex structure, which slowly releases Sb 3+ ions enabling a homogenous growth .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7B). Previous studies have reported that the binding energy of Sb 3d 3/2 core for Sb(III) and Sb(V) within antimonic oxides were usually 538.8-539.4 and 539.8-541.7 eV respectively (Huang and Ruiz, 2006;Mittal et al, 2011). The ) as observed by XRD and TMS.…”
Section: A Topmentioning
confidence: 85%