2002
DOI: 10.1078/1438-4639-00114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption of toxic heavy metals to soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, earthworms from Furnas and Santa Maria differed significantly in the concentrations of Zn, the concentrations being almost twofold higher in the former. Factors such as pH, %clay-silt, and %OM are recognized to influence metal bioavailability in soils (Alumaa et al, 2002;Depledge et al, 1994;Kennette et al, 2002). Therefore, the Santa Maria soils, that have considerably higher %clay-silt than Furnas soils, have significantly higher adsorption levels of Zn, even though the levels of Zn in the soils were not statistically different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, earthworms from Furnas and Santa Maria differed significantly in the concentrations of Zn, the concentrations being almost twofold higher in the former. Factors such as pH, %clay-silt, and %OM are recognized to influence metal bioavailability in soils (Alumaa et al, 2002;Depledge et al, 1994;Kennette et al, 2002). Therefore, the Santa Maria soils, that have considerably higher %clay-silt than Furnas soils, have significantly higher adsorption levels of Zn, even though the levels of Zn in the soils were not statistically different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as natural process, the partition of the soluble metal added to soils, together with the covarying solution chemistry, are controlled by soil properties (Alumaa et al 2002;Ponizovsky et al 2008;Yu et al 2002), while the artificial leaching may disturb the entire soil solution except for counterions and generate temporary thermodynamic equilibriums which might be largely determined by leaching process (e.g., the duration of leaching, the composition of leaching solution, and the total volume of leaching solution). Hence, to what extent the leaching is sufficient, that is, whether the leaching effect following a conventional leaching protocol is comparable among soils and whether the leaching effect can be predicted with soil parameters, are critically important.…”
Section: Leaching Effect On Ni Concentration and Ec50 In Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various soils show a very different behavior in sorption of heavy metals (Alumaa, Kirso, Petersell, & Steinnes, 2002), because the concentration of each heavy metal is always controlled by different parameters (soil pH, iron and aluminum oxide content, clay content, organic matter and cation exchange capacity) (Hernandez, L. Probst, A. Probst, & Ulrich, 2003). Various metals also exhibit different preferential leaching from soils.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%