2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-014-3258-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption of uranyl and arsenate on SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2 and FeOOH

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although numerous studies have investigated the cosorption of uranyl-arsenate onto various mineral surfaces, only a few studies have focused on their aqueous properties. , Through the time-resolved laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy (TRLFS) measurements, it has been suggested that UO 2 H 2 AsO 4 + is the major uranyl arsenate species in the pH range of 1.5–3.5 . Their microstructures were further investigated by Gezahegne et al (2012), who proposed that the bidentate-coordinated 1:2 complex (i.e., UO 2 (H 2 AsO 4 ) 2 0 ) rather than UO 2 H 2 AsO 4 + should be dominant at a pH of 2 by combining static density functional theory (DFT) calculation and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) fitting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerous studies have investigated the cosorption of uranyl-arsenate onto various mineral surfaces, only a few studies have focused on their aqueous properties. , Through the time-resolved laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy (TRLFS) measurements, it has been suggested that UO 2 H 2 AsO 4 + is the major uranyl arsenate species in the pH range of 1.5–3.5 . Their microstructures were further investigated by Gezahegne et al (2012), who proposed that the bidentate-coordinated 1:2 complex (i.e., UO 2 (H 2 AsO 4 ) 2 0 ) rather than UO 2 H 2 AsO 4 + should be dominant at a pH of 2 by combining static density functional theory (DFT) calculation and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) fitting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] Nair et al have used SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , TiO 2 and FeOOH to adsorb uranyl and arsenate. [17] Xu et al have synthesized amidoximated chitosangrafted polyacrylonitrile for uranium (VI) adsorption. [18] Gu et al have prepared graphene oxide-carbon nanotubes hybrid aerogels for removal of uranium (VI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the binding energy and relative strength of Si-O and Al-O are also reduced. This is because in the silicon aluminum oxide, the oxygen atom will have a certain complexation with uranyl ion (Nair et al 2014). However, the binding energy of C=O did not change, indicating that C=O did not participate in the adsorption reaction, similar to the ZHANG study (Zhang et al 2019c).…”
Section: Xps Analysismentioning
confidence: 58%