2012
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorting by parity to reduce aggression toward first-parity sows in group-gestation housing systems1

Abstract: Young sows are subordinate and vulnerable in group-housing systems because they usually lose most fights and suffer more injuries than mature sows at mixing. This study was conducted to evaluate effects of sorting by parity on reducing aggression and associated stress with the aim to improve welfare and performance of first-parity sows in a group-housed system. Sows and gilts (n = 180) from 6 breeding groups were used. Within each group, 2 groups of 15 females were mixed in each of 2 treatment pens after weani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors suggest that primiparous sows should not be grouped with older and bigger animals, as increased attacks and increased injury scores in the younger animals were identified ). Others agree with this and state young sows are more likely to be classified as subordinate, thus making them vulnerable in group housing systems (Bench et al, 2012;Li et al, 2012). The weight difference between parity one sows and multiparous sows is on average 25% (Li et al, 2012) equating to around 200 kg versus 250 kg (Li et al, 2010).…”
Section: Sow Weight and Parity Mixesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors suggest that primiparous sows should not be grouped with older and bigger animals, as increased attacks and increased injury scores in the younger animals were identified ). Others agree with this and state young sows are more likely to be classified as subordinate, thus making them vulnerable in group housing systems (Bench et al, 2012;Li et al, 2012). The weight difference between parity one sows and multiparous sows is on average 25% (Li et al, 2012) equating to around 200 kg versus 250 kg (Li et al, 2010).…”
Section: Sow Weight and Parity Mixesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Others agree with this and state young sows are more likely to be classified as subordinate, thus making them vulnerable in group housing systems (Bench et al, 2012;Li et al, 2012). The weight difference between parity one sows and multiparous sows is on average 25% (Li et al, 2012) equating to around 200 kg versus 250 kg (Li et al, 2010). This weight disparity may help to explain the vulnerability of younger animals in mixed-parity groups.…”
Section: Sow Weight and Parity Mixesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has also been reported that mixing of pigs has an effect on cortisol levels as it is considered a result of social stress [911]. Further young sows experience more social stress when housed together with older sows and young sows have a higher cortisol level compared to the older sows [12]. An increase in cortisol levels could also be linked to a reduced on-farm animal welfare [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gilts are generally subordinate to sows, and would be likely to receive more aggression and injuries compared with sows (Levis, 2013). Therefore, gilts under ESF systems would have more adaptation failure than sows, and it has been recommended that gilts are housed separately from sows (Levis, 2013;Li, Wang, & Johnston, 2012). Also, difficulties in adapting to ESF systems could be eased by training the pigs before they are introduced into such a system (Chapinal et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%