2010
DOI: 10.2478/v10168-010-0014-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound-Absorbing and Insulating Enclosures for Ultrasonic Range

Abstract: The physical phenomena occurring in sound-absorbing and insulating enclosures are subject of the present paper. These phenomena are: absorption in air and by the sound-absorbing material covering the walls and the coincidence effect. The absorption in the air can be neglected in small size enclosures for low ultrasonic frequencies (20-30 kHz). The coincidence plays a role in decrease of the sound insulation, however the main role play the leaks. The boards made of ceramic fibers have been chosen as the optimal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the relation between objective and subjective results of exposure to this hazard factor in the work environment, it is necessary to take appropriate preventive actions (technical organizational and medical actions) (Regulation of the Minister of Health and Social Policy of 30 May 1996 Regulation of the Minister of Economy and Labour of August 5, 2005). Devices emitting high frequency noise should be equipped by the manufacturers with means of technical protections against noise (soundproof and isolation casings shields or silencers) (Dobrucki et al, 2010) In the case when those ways of noise limitations at workplaces are impossible, the employer should fit the workers with hearing protections or plugs. When the measurements of noise parameters in reference to an 8-hour workday the MAI values are exceeded, a properly time of work or even a full stop of activity should be implemented as well as employees' rotation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the relation between objective and subjective results of exposure to this hazard factor in the work environment, it is necessary to take appropriate preventive actions (technical organizational and medical actions) (Regulation of the Minister of Health and Social Policy of 30 May 1996 Regulation of the Minister of Economy and Labour of August 5, 2005). Devices emitting high frequency noise should be equipped by the manufacturers with means of technical protections against noise (soundproof and isolation casings shields or silencers) (Dobrucki et al, 2010) In the case when those ways of noise limitations at workplaces are impossible, the employer should fit the workers with hearing protections or plugs. When the measurements of noise parameters in reference to an 8-hour workday the MAI values are exceeded, a properly time of work or even a full stop of activity should be implemented as well as employees' rotation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A solution to this problem could be the application of the reverberant standard method in a special miniaturized test chamber (Dobrucki et al, 2010) or the use of the impulse method (the tone-burst technique).…”
Section: Methods Of Determination Of Sound Absorption Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these devices can be operated in sealed (fully closed) sound-insulating enclosures [11] and then ultrasonic noise outside such enclosure is, in the majority of cases, very small and negligible from the point of view of its harmful effect on humans [4,5]. Therefore, fully sealed enclosures (especially those provided with an inner lining of sound absorbing material) turn out to be a very effective measure of ultrasonic sound reduction [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The parameter characterising acoustic effectiveness of an enclosure in scope of its ability to attenuate the sound penetrating through it is called "the sound insulation of acoustic enclosure" (or "the sound insulation of enclosure") in applicable standards and literature of the subject [11,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%