2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound absorption coefficient assessment of sisal, coconut husk and sugar cane fibers for low frequencies based on three different methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These properties make natural fibers able to compete with glass fibers in composite materials [34][35][36]. However, there are some disadvantages that restrict the use of natural fibers in industry, such as incompatibility with specific polymeric matrices, formation of aggregates while processing, and their poor resistance to moisture [37][38][39]. To control these drawbacks, natural fibers are often treated with suitable chemicals/methods, e.g., silane, graft copolymerization, isocyanate, mercerization, acetylation, benzyl compounds and acrylamide [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties make natural fibers able to compete with glass fibers in composite materials [34][35][36]. However, there are some disadvantages that restrict the use of natural fibers in industry, such as incompatibility with specific polymeric matrices, formation of aggregates while processing, and their poor resistance to moisture [37][38][39]. To control these drawbacks, natural fibers are often treated with suitable chemicals/methods, e.g., silane, graft copolymerization, isocyanate, mercerization, acetylation, benzyl compounds and acrylamide [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the sound absorption and acoustic impedance tests, the incident plane wave that is reflected (i.e., reflected wave) is measured by the probe that is placed facing the sample. The normal sound absorption coefficient (α-Equation ( 1)) was calculated by monitoring the frequency-dependent reflection coefficient (R(ω)-Equation ( 2)) on a fixed position (x) [18]. This reflection coefficient is determined by the measurement of the acoustic impedance (Z(ω)) during the test, according to Equation ( 3), where P is the captures sound pressure level and u the particle velocity [19]:…”
Section: Acoustic Testing Of the Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of incident acoustic impedance (Zi) were measured recurring to the same method used for the sound absorption coefficient (Equation ( 3)). As for the transmitted acoustic impedance (Zt) was determined in a similar approach, but by changing the probe to the other side of the sample (Figure 6) to measure the transmitted wave: The normal sound absorption coefficient (α-Equation ( 1)) was calculated by monitoring the frequency-dependent reflection coefficient (R(ω)-Equation ( 2)) on a fixed position (x) [18]. This reflection coefficient is determined by the measurement of the acoustic impedance (Z(ω)) during the test, according to Equation ( 3), where P is the captures sound pressure level and u the particle velocity [19]:…”
Section: Acoustic Testing Of the Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Attenborough [35] has pointed out that empirical relationships of the form of Equations (1) and (2) should be valid for fibrous porous materials as well as non-fibrous ones. Therefore, the Delany and Bazley model has been successfully applied to different sound-absorbing materials [36][37][38], including those made of natural fibers [39,40]. One such study was recently presented by Berardi and Iannace [32].…”
Section: Empirical Model For Fibrous Sound-absorbing Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%