2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound absorption performance of a filled honeycomb composite structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneously, the airflow resistance of the sandwiched FCNSs (4.9 × 10 6 Pa s m −2 ) was between FCNS-5 (1.8 × 10 6 Pa s m −2 ) and FCNS-18 (11.3 × 10 6 Pa s m −2 ) (Fig. 5h), which was proportional to the sample density 60,61 . Moreover, the corresponding specific acoustic impedance had also been calculated, where the real (Re [Z]) and imaginary (Im [Z]) parts represented the transmission resistance and inertial acoustic resistance of sound waves, respectively (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Simultaneously, the airflow resistance of the sandwiched FCNSs (4.9 × 10 6 Pa s m −2 ) was between FCNS-5 (1.8 × 10 6 Pa s m −2 ) and FCNS-18 (11.3 × 10 6 Pa s m −2 ) (Fig. 5h), which was proportional to the sample density 60,61 . Moreover, the corresponding specific acoustic impedance had also been calculated, where the real (Re [Z]) and imaginary (Im [Z]) parts represented the transmission resistance and inertial acoustic resistance of sound waves, respectively (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…15, Table 2, and Supplementary Methods). 59 Obviously, the sound pressure drop of the GCNA-18 and sandwiched GCNAs (red to green color) was much greater than GCNA-5 (red to yellow color), which was consistent with the poor low-frequency absorption of GCNA-5. However, in contrast to the rapid drop in sound pressure of GCNA-18 as a consequence of its overlarge density and excessive re ections, the sound pressure of the sandwiched GCNA was generally high in the rst unit and then decreased continuously, indicating that more sound waves could enter and then were gradually consumed, which were consistent with high absorption coe cients of sandwiched GCNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Meanwhile, movement between adjacent mediator molecules can produce viscous and friction forces, causing the energy wave to be dissipated after being converted into thermal energy (Kishor and Pawar, 2019). Along with the advancement of materials science, more and more composite materials have also been applied in the field of noise and vibration absorption (Dunne et al, 2017;Yang and Sheng, 2017;Zhao et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2019;Xie et al, 2020). Carbon nanocomposites, such as carbon nanofibers, carbon nanotubes, and graphenes, have become the most promising vibration and noise absorption composites, owing to their favorable compatibilities, excellent sound and vibration absorption properties, and wide wave absorption frequency band.…”
Section: Vibration and Noise Reduction Based On The Property Of Soundmentioning
confidence: 99%