2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound absorption performance of porous metal fiber materials with different structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the sound absorption property of our SAC sponges with that of other sound absorption materials in terms of NRC and areal density ( Fig. 7d and Supplementary Table 2) 29,46,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] . Our SAC sponges show lightweight characteristic and better sound absorption property.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the sound absorption property of our SAC sponges with that of other sound absorption materials in terms of NRC and areal density ( Fig. 7d and Supplementary Table 2) 29,46,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] . Our SAC sponges show lightweight characteristic and better sound absorption property.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the Johnson-Champoux-Allard model [20,21], complex effective density ρ(ω) and complex effective bulk modulus K(ω) of the single compressed porous metal could be obtained according to the derived structural parameters, as shown in Equations (4) and (5), respectively. Here, ω was the sound angular frequency, which could be calculated by Equation (6); ρ was the density of the air with normal temperature, 1.21 Kg/m 3 ; γ was the specific heat ratio of the air, 1.40; P 0 was the standard static pressure of the air, 1.013 •10 5 Pa; N u was the Nusselt number, 4.36; P r was the Prandtl number, 0.71 [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Meanwhile, j was the symbol of the imaginary number.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normally, sound absorption performance of the sound absorber with certain thickness is evaluated by the average sound absorption coefficient in the given frequency range, which indicates that the desired sound absorber must achieve a higher average sound absorption coefficient and utilize smaller total thickness simultaneously. Moreover, taking the practical applications into account, besides the outstanding sound absorption performance, the desired sound absorber should have the additional advantages of low fabrication cost, excellent fire resistance, fine environmental friendliness, convenient installability, and easy maintainability [6,7]. Therefore, these factors should be taken into consideration in developing the sound absorber for practical application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gradient-structural porous metal and the multilayer porous metal have been developed to further improve absorption efficiency and reduce total thickness [11,12,13,14,15]. Zhu et al [11] had prepared metal fiber porous material with gradient pore structures, and average sound absorption coefficient in the 50–6400 Hz for the optimal sample with thin-thickness of 3.0 mm reached 35%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cheng et al [14] had developed the various nickel foam-based multilayer sound absorbing structure, and the optimal sound absorption coefficient could reach 0.4 in 1000–1600 Hz range for the composite structure of five-layer foam with backed 5-mm-thick cavity. The porous metal fiber materials with gradient structure was fabricated by Wang et al [15], and its average absorption coefficient reached 37.52% in the 50–6400 Hz range when thickness of the three-layer gradient structure was 6 mm. It can be judged from this research that gradient and superposed porous metals will potentially realize high efficiency and thin thickness simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%