2020
DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2020.1838324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound production in male and female corkwing wrasses and its relation to visual behaviour

Abstract: In fish, social interactions are commonly accompanied by acoustic signalling. Males have been found to produce sounds in a large range of species, but female sounds have received considerably less attention. But even in males, there remain significant taxonomical gaps, e.g. in one of the largest fish families, the wrasses. Here, we investigate sound production in territorial males and females of the corkwing wrasse in a field study in Norway. We complemented an in-depth analysis of the visual and acoustic beha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is further confirmed by the sound features, which align with holocentrid sounds recorded in previous studies 21 , 24 26 . The cleaner fish, on the other hand, did not produce any sounds, consistent with observations that members of that family (Labridae) do not encompass many vocal species 25 , 40 . These findings were consistent across a vast geographic area (French Polynesia, Seychelles, Guam, and Philippines) and were based on observations from 64 videos (and 190 interactions) featuring various client fish and cleaners.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This observation is further confirmed by the sound features, which align with holocentrid sounds recorded in previous studies 21 , 24 26 . The cleaner fish, on the other hand, did not produce any sounds, consistent with observations that members of that family (Labridae) do not encompass many vocal species 25 , 40 . These findings were consistent across a vast geographic area (French Polynesia, Seychelles, Guam, and Philippines) and were based on observations from 64 videos (and 190 interactions) featuring various client fish and cleaners.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…There are differences in the mechanisms of sound production in different organisms [ 44 ], and in most animals studied for sound production, males have historically been the main sex studied, and they are thought to be the group that primarily uses sound signals [ 45 ]. Bussmann’s findings underscore the potential and importance of future research on vocal communication in neglected taxa and in both sexes [ 46 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The STFT was first used to study animal sounds in 1971 (Coutlee, 1971 ), and has since become a ubiquitous feature of research in bioacoustics (Baotic et al., 2014 ; Boucher et al., 2020 ; Bussmann et al., 2021 ; Cazau et al., 2016 ; Davenport et al., 2022 ; Dutour et al., 2021 ; Gonzalo‐Tarodo et al., 2020 ; Jégh‐Czinege et al., 2020 ; Leroy et al., 2021 ; Malige et al., 2020 ; Mann et al., 2021 ; McDonald et al., 2009 ; Odom et al., 2021 ; Stoeger et al., 2014 ; Teixeira et al., 2022 ; Thode et al., 2017 ); however, the TF bias is rarely discussed in the bioacoustics literature. TF analysis is used widely in engineering, where it is generally acknowledged that this bias imposes a limit on the STFT spectrogram's accuracy when applied to complex signals, especially at low frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these fields have adopted other methods. While there has been at least one study highlighting the issues with the STFT spectrogram in the study of animal sounds (Brumm et al., 2017 ), this remains the most common method in the biological sciences (Baotic et al., 2014 ; Benko & Perc, 2009 ; Bonnefond et al., 2020 ; Bussmann et al., 2021 ; Cazau et al., 2016 ; Davenport et al., 2022 ; Dutour et al., 2021 ; Forti et al., 2017 ; Gonzalo‐Tarodo et al., 2020 ; Jégh‐Czinege et al., 2020 ; Leroy et al., 2021 ; Malige et al., 2020 ; Mann et al., 2021 ; Maruska & Mensinger, 2009 ; McDonald et al., 2009 ; Nelson et al., 2011 ; Odom et al., 2021 ; Rice & Bass, 2009 ; Salas et al., 2018 ; Staniewicz et al., 2023 ; Stoeger et al., 2014 ; Sueur et al., 2011 ; Teixeira et al., 2022 ; Thode et al., 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%