1957
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45881-1_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound Propagation in Air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where E S is the bolide source energy (J), E aw the observed acoustic wave energy per unit area at the observation point (J/m 2 ); r m the density of the meteor (kg/m 3 ); Dp the observed signal overpressure (Pa); p g the ambient pressure at the ground (Pa); p S the ambient pressure at the source altitude (Pa); c S the average acoustic sound speed (m/s); V the meteor velocity (m/s); t the observed period of signal at maximum amplitude (s); e ac the acoustic efficiency; f R the ground reflection factor of Cox (1958); R 0 the slant range between source and receiver (m); R the ground projected range to source (m); R max the ducted wave skip distance, counterwind (200 km), downwind (400 km) (m). A similar detailed analytical treatment of meteor infrasound was also attempted by Golitsyn et al (1977) and recently applied to infrasonic observations of the Vitim bolide by Shumilov et al (2003).…”
Section: Previous Methods Of Energy Determination Using Infrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where E S is the bolide source energy (J), E aw the observed acoustic wave energy per unit area at the observation point (J/m 2 ); r m the density of the meteor (kg/m 3 ); Dp the observed signal overpressure (Pa); p g the ambient pressure at the ground (Pa); p S the ambient pressure at the source altitude (Pa); c S the average acoustic sound speed (m/s); V the meteor velocity (m/s); t the observed period of signal at maximum amplitude (s); e ac the acoustic efficiency; f R the ground reflection factor of Cox (1958); R 0 the slant range between source and receiver (m); R the ground projected range to source (m); R max the ducted wave skip distance, counterwind (200 km), downwind (400 km) (m). A similar detailed analytical treatment of meteor infrasound was also attempted by Golitsyn et al (1977) and recently applied to infrasonic observations of the Vitim bolide by Shumilov et al (2003).…”
Section: Previous Methods Of Energy Determination Using Infrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, we have predicted values of the mean sound speed scale height of 33.3 km (333.3 km) for an assumed vertical mean sound speed gradient= 0.01 m/s/m (0.001 m/s/m), which corresponds to size parameter values of $62.8 ( $6280) for wave frequencies of 0.10 Hz (1.0 Hz), respectively. This has of course been anticipated for a very long time (Cox, 1958), but it is reassuring that the size parameter approach also formally predicts this expected behavior as well.…”
Section: Fluctuation Scale Height Implications: Explanations Of Up-wimentioning
confidence: 75%
“…14 and 15 can also be systematically compared against similar results, but without any wave frequency information, presented in Cox (1958) in his Fig. 12 for example.…”
Section: Inclusion Of Sound Speed Fluctuations At All Heightsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional references (some classical, others relatively recent) may be found in these papers. An important fundamental reference to the subject of atmospheric sound transmission is Cox (1957). The textbook by Richardson (1927) is elementary and very old but nevertheless gives an unusually clear account of early work, with numerous references.…”
Section: Anmentioning
confidence: 99%