1986
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(86)90234-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound radiation from ducts: Theory and experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BEM models were computed by using the 3-D RAYON code, based on a variational formulation of the integral form (38) [24]. The components of the full square matrix are double integrals over the surface , the second member is a simple integral over .…”
Section: Boundary Element Model Denitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BEM models were computed by using the 3-D RAYON code, based on a variational formulation of the integral form (38) [24]. The components of the full square matrix are double integrals over the surface , the second member is a simple integral over .…”
Section: Boundary Element Model Denitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundary element method (BEM) has also been applied by several authors and in principle this method is capable of examining ducts of arbitrary crosssection, although to date only radiation from ducts with a circular cross-section has been examined. 5,20,21 For example, Dalmont et al 5 examined unflanged circular ducts, where they found it necessary to assign a finite length duct in place of the (nominally) infinite duct when modeling the duct exterior and so assume that the effect of this on the computed end correction is negligible. Dalmont et al do, however, note that their BEM approach gives inaccurate results for values of Helmholtz number less than 0.18 (based on duct radius); this is probably due to the BEM finding it difficult to resolve low values of acoustic pressure in the exterior sound field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In acoustics, the BEM requires the acoustic variables within the acoustic domain to be expressed as a surface integral over the boundary of the domain. There are two different formulations for the BEM: (a) the direct [9,15] and (b) indirect methods [11,12]. The difference between them is a result of the choice of primary variables [16].…”
Section: Modeling Sound Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two most commonly used numerical methods for solving acoustical problems are finite element methods [6][7][8] (FEM) and the boundary element [9][10][11][12][13] (BEM). The FEM solves the response in the acoustic domain itself by computing the mass and stiffness of the acoustic domain.…”
Section: Modeling Sound Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%