2001
DOI: 10.1260/1351010011501722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound Transmission Loss of Thick Perforated Panels

Abstract: A study is reported of the sound transmission loss of perforated panels. The study includes a theoretical analysis and measurement by means of sound intensity. The predicted transmission loss is similar to that measured above 630 Hz. The maximum discrepancy is less than 2 dB. The perforation in a thick panel is found to reduce the coincidence effect at the critical frequency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to validate the results of airborne sound insulation obtained for the tests carried out in the reduced sized transmission chamber, they were compared with results obtained in standard transmission chambers and the theoretical results obtained through simulation with Aisla 3 prediction software [62]. This simulation software is based on the predictive models of acoustic insulation described by Ookura & Saito and Chen & Jan [63,64] based on impedance coupling with known mechanical data of the materials (elastic module, loss factor, thickness, and density). Figure 5 shows the sound reduction index (R) obtained by the different methods described above.…”
Section: Acoustic Validation Of the Reduced Sized Transmission Chambermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to validate the results of airborne sound insulation obtained for the tests carried out in the reduced sized transmission chamber, they were compared with results obtained in standard transmission chambers and the theoretical results obtained through simulation with Aisla 3 prediction software [62]. This simulation software is based on the predictive models of acoustic insulation described by Ookura & Saito and Chen & Jan [63,64] based on impedance coupling with known mechanical data of the materials (elastic module, loss factor, thickness, and density). Figure 5 shows the sound reduction index (R) obtained by the different methods described above.…”
Section: Acoustic Validation Of the Reduced Sized Transmission Chambermentioning
confidence: 99%