2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00269-015-0789-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound velocity and elastic properties of Fe–Ni and Fe–Ni–C liquids at high pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thermodynamic properties of liquid iron at a pressure of 0.1 MPa calculated from our EoS (Supplementary Table S4) are in good agreement with the measured values of density84, the sound velocity ( v P ) and adiabatic bulk modulus848586. The calculated entropy at pressure 0.1 MPa is very close to the reference data9.…”
Section: Eoss For Solid and Liquid Fe To 350 Gpasupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The thermodynamic properties of liquid iron at a pressure of 0.1 MPa calculated from our EoS (Supplementary Table S4) are in good agreement with the measured values of density84, the sound velocity ( v P ) and adiabatic bulk modulus848586. The calculated entropy at pressure 0.1 MPa is very close to the reference data9.…”
Section: Eoss For Solid and Liquid Fe To 350 Gpasupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Indeed, recognizable compressibility behavior anomalies reported for liquids Fe‐5.7 wt % C (Sanloup et al, ), Fe‐6.7 wt % C (Terasaki et al, ), and Fe‐3.5 wt % C (Shimoyama et al, ) at ~5 GPa can be readily explained by the liquid structure transition. Measurements for viscosity (Terasaki et al, ) and sound velocity (Kuwabara et al, ; Shimoyama et al, ) for Fe‐(Ni)‐C liquids are limited to <5 GPa or extremely sparse, and the effect of structural transition on these properties remains unclear. On the analogy of metallic glass systems in which clusters with three‐atom connections are stiffer than the two‐atom and four‐atom counterparts (Ding et al, ), higher viscosity is anticipated for the Fe‐Ni‐C liquids with higher fraction of three‐atom connections above ~5 GPa.…”
Section: Discussion and Geophysical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the Fe‐Ni‐C system is considered, because of the high cosmochemical abundance of carbon, frequent occurrence of Fe carbide phases in meteorites, and high affinity and solubility of carbon in Fe‐Ni liquids under the core‐mantle differentiation conditions (Chen & Li, ; Dasgupta & Walker, ; Wood, ; Wood et al, ). Limited experimental data on the thermoeleastic and viscoelastic properties of the Fe‐Ni‐C liquids, however, have restricted our discussion of carbon‐bearing planetary core compositional models (Kuwabara et al, ; Sanloup et al, ; Shimoyama et al, , ; Terasaki et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density was measured using the X‐ray absorption method based on the Beer‐Lambert law or using the X‐ray computed tomography (CT) measurement. For the measurements below 1 GPa, an 80‐ton portable uniaxial press (Urakawa et al, ) was used combined with X‐ray computed‐tomography (CT) measurements (Kuwabara et al, ) at the BL20XU beamline, SPring‐8 synchrotron radiation facility in Japan. High pressure was generated using opposing cupped WC anvils (diameter of the center cup was 12 mm) with a ringed groove.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the compressional wave velocities ( V P ) of liquid Fe‐Ni, Fe‐S, and Fe‐C have been measured in static high‐pressure experiments. These results show that S, C, and Ni reduce the V P of liquid Fe at pressures below 10 GPa (Jing et al, ; Kuwabara et al, ; Nishida et al, , ; Shimoyama et al, ), while S and C increase the V P of liquid Fe above 10 GPa (Kawaguchi et al, ; Nakajima et al, ). To explain these trends, a possible change in the structure and electronic properties of liquid Fe‐S is thought to occur at around 10 GPa (Kawaguchi et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%